Oh my god I can't believe it. I'm so happy and sad for Sharon! I'm so happy that they aren't Michaela's like she wanted, I had a gut feeling it was hers but I'm glad my gut was wrong. But I'm sad because she still has no answers about her daughter and this leads us back to the start and what happened to her. Although it is possible she could be identified in another well. Herzog looks like the sketch so much. I'm hoping Shermantine is lying and just doing it for publicity. I really do want Michaela to be reunited with her mother though, I'd love for her to be alive. If I could solve one missing child case, this would be the one. It hits home very hard for me for some reason.
I'm so sad for Kimberely Billy's family though. It's a disgrace that her remains, which I believe have been returned home, were given to JoAnn's parents. But why did they say the remains were of a child between 7-13? (Or whatever the estimation was). Wasn't Kimberely a teenager? I thought Kimberely was older than JoAnn when she went missing? ETA: Kimberely was 19 when she went missing.
Found Deceased CA - Kimberly Ann Billy, 19, Stockton, 11 Dec 1984 - Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community How do they mix up the bones of a young adult and think they belong to a child? Furthermore, how do they mix up the bones when someone's been identified? I assume they would've had all of Kimberely's data on there, so it just seems like such a weird slip up. Kimberely was 5'5 and 130lbs, Joann was 4'8 and 80lbs, Michaela was 4'8 and 75lbs. Joann had the build of a child, so the slip up there is more... realistic, I guess the word is, to be mixed with a child who has pretty much the exact same build, but Kimberely was much taller than both of them, so I find it strange that they confused the bones of a 5'5, 130lbs girl with the bones of a 4'8, 80lbs girl. Not only that, but confused her bones as belonging to a child.