No chain of custody documents have been provided to the defense for the bullet:
d.
Chain of custody documents related to the bullet purportedly found near the bodies of L.G. and A.W. To date, no such data has been located by the defense or the defense cannot locate that information in spite of requesting said information from the State of Indiana.
But also,
What is the importance of the “sticks, branches, and bark” found at the scene? It wasn’t mentioned in the PCA; IIRC the blood used to draw the alleged “F” on the tree was said to be Libby’s. Is the D implying there was other potential evidence (like DNA?) on sticks, branches, and bark found at the CS? Or are they implying there is no chain of custody for the blood evidence (re: the “F”)? I may have missed something, does anyone know the potential significance of these items? TIA
e.
Chain of custody documents related to the sticks, branches and bark found at the scene. To date, no such data has been located by the defense or the defense cannot locate that information in spite of requesting said information from the State of Indiana.
p.8
View attachment 499310
Source:
p.8
MOTION TO COMPEL AND MOTION FOR SANCTIONS
filed by Auger, Baldwin, and Rozzi
Motion to Compel & Request for Sanctions