kaen
Trying to be a good human.
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2014
- Messages
- 6,654
- Reaction score
- 48,114
Wow. A second woman with a similar experience and, fortunately, a different outome.
To be frank, I know first responders can't save everyone. I have been in a situation (as a civilian but trained in first aid/cpr) where I came upon an accident of two teens who were clearly deceased. The other person who stopped and I did what we could but we felt impotent realizing we weren't changing an outcome. First responders are in that situation all the time-- despite best efforts but getting negative results.
First responders have to insure their safety while trying to protect the lives of those in peril or severely injured. I think this department was caught short handed given the event that was occurring. First responders take their lead from those who prioritize calls-- they have to trust the calls made by their dispatch and leadership team. The woman who survived felt she was misled about the order of priority and ETA of the help. To a person who may need to make a decision to leave their vehicle or whatever she could do, if the information was misleading, then, they could have been responsible for her death. Terrifying.
I have not had any kind words for the dispatcher in Ms. Steven's case or this new one (if they are not the same person--but IIRC the LEO said that only one person was on duty that night s0.....). And, I still don't. When people are panicked, the person helping can't be hysterical but rather calm, clear, matter of fact, and provide hope. No one wants a dispatcher who is crying with the person or unable to think clearly. It is a delicate balance. At the end of the day, a dispatcher with little or no empathy should not have the job. In Ms. Smith's case, she hung up and got help on her own because her dispatcher was misleading and unkind. This is beyond excusable.
To be frank, I know first responders can't save everyone. I have been in a situation (as a civilian but trained in first aid/cpr) where I came upon an accident of two teens who were clearly deceased. The other person who stopped and I did what we could but we felt impotent realizing we weren't changing an outcome. First responders are in that situation all the time-- despite best efforts but getting negative results.
First responders have to insure their safety while trying to protect the lives of those in peril or severely injured. I think this department was caught short handed given the event that was occurring. First responders take their lead from those who prioritize calls-- they have to trust the calls made by their dispatch and leadership team. The woman who survived felt she was misled about the order of priority and ETA of the help. To a person who may need to make a decision to leave their vehicle or whatever she could do, if the information was misleading, then, they could have been responsible for her death. Terrifying.
I have not had any kind words for the dispatcher in Ms. Steven's case or this new one (if they are not the same person--but IIRC the LEO said that only one person was on duty that night s0.....). And, I still don't. When people are panicked, the person helping can't be hysterical but rather calm, clear, matter of fact, and provide hope. No one wants a dispatcher who is crying with the person or unable to think clearly. It is a delicate balance. At the end of the day, a dispatcher with little or no empathy should not have the job. In Ms. Smith's case, she hung up and got help on her own because her dispatcher was misleading and unkind. This is beyond excusable.