Chester_from_THM
Member
- Joined
- May 13, 2012
- Messages
- 953
- Reaction score
- 3
This is sad. This witness looks so young. I can't imagine how traumatic this must have been for him.
It would have been recorded on the cell phone so yes i would believe him. There is NOTHING on that cell phone that suggests he gave any warning death was about to face that child.
Who said that? GZ? Yes. IMO a self serving statement I doubt there will be evidence he was going to Target.
The thing that keeps popping up in my mind is that most likely TM was so much faster than GZ. If he would have ran, There is no way GZ would have caught him. Why did he come back to confront GZ? He had to have because GZ had lost him.
Well there ya have it. Not sure why they're bothering with this whole trial thing. It's quite expensive and time consuming lol
So it is okay to profile GZ but not TM??
He was not dangerous. He just happened to spot TM standing on a friends property and called the police. That is not suspicious. If he was up to no good he would not have called the police.
Trayvon had just turned 17. He was a kid! He was legally a minor, a kid, a teen. Those are the facts.
What I don't understand is why he should have had to run in the first place-
Seriously had he run GZ would have followed pointed out where he went to LE and then the question would be "if you did nothing wrong why did you run?"
Happens every day. Seriously though' some are declaring that GZ did absolutely nada that was wrong or illegal. That won't wash. Florida doesn't hold murder trails for amusement sake.
Almost impossible to tell the age of a six-foot one-inch person in a hooded sweatshirt.
If it was to save himself all he needed to say is stop or i will shoot.
The kid is dead so I guess GZ was pretty dangerous
Looking for trouble? Lol he was on the phone with police.
I have an idea.....lets discuss what is CURRENTLY going on in the trial. I know that opening statements bring up a lot of things, but they have not actually started to put things into evidence yet. Too many discussions about what people "feel" happened and going back and forth with others that don't agree. Lets discuss those as they come up.
As far as opening statements, I think the defense went on waayyy to long. They should know what is and what isn't allowed in opening statements. How many times did the judge have to tell him that what he was discussing was for Closing Arguments. She had to tell him a couple times also that she will give the jury their instructions in closing and that he does not do that in opening. Wonder why O'Mara didn't give the opening??