Leila
Active Member
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2005
- Messages
- 12,378
- Reaction score
- 28
She wasn't asked any questions.
I realize that DD wasn't asked any questions, but I think that goes towards the likelihood that the purpose of her being there was to argue for immunity and if immunity was granted, she would then testify at a later date.
My thoughts are based on the explanation given by the former prosecutor who was interviewed on one of the morning shows the following day in which he explained the "compelled to testify with immunity" clause. He said that in that case the purpose is to have someone who has criminal culpability given immunity to testify because the goal is a "bigger fish."
If this is the case, then I suspect DD's criminal culpability might be minor compared to what she knows.