I knew them BOTH very well.Trinket’s connection is more with CW than Shanann. Colorado was closer to Shanann.
I knew them BOTH very well.Trinket’s connection is more with CW than Shanann. Colorado was closer to Shanann.
I don't recall those discussions being reported as CW wanting a separation.
Agree. Do we know of anymore? I find it strange that no-one out of the MLM circle has spoken up apart from one VI.
No of course not, nor do I. I mean on MSM?
Yes that could have possibly been the case. When AT gave the interview though she was and probably still is part of the Thrive family.She had neighbors she was close with- The Thayers. Just because AT was also involved with Thrive doesn't mean that's how she necessarily met Shan'ann (I'd bet Shan'ann got her involved in the course of their friendship).
That wasn't my point. My point was Trinket could be family or friend. My response was directed at the person asking why the friends speaking up were all involved with Thrive. So I wouldn't say HEY this VI is a friend, because I don't know if they're a friend or family member. That isn't clear. Whereas with Colorado, who I tagged, it is clear.Doesn't matter. Trinket passed the strict WS VI requirements.
Well said.Being in a small minority on this case, we are constantly having to defend our comments. Also from the beginning we were constantly called trolls, the majority advised on many occasions to use the ignore button and roll and scroll. It's not nice and it is WOW, but we have to sit back and watch our opinions be taken out of context, told we are jealous of SW and generally given no encouragement (by quite a few, not all) to explain our theories so they may understand. Your initial reaction is Woah, imagine that woah nearly every time you express your opinion. So unfortunately yes I do have to roll and scroll to stop myself from breaching TOS's.
True. But there’s no evidence of either being true. Taking the word of a proven, self confessed liar, as true, is risky business.There has been much speculation that CW has a personality/mental disorder and that's why he so easily murdered his children and threw them away. But if SW murdered her children as CW claims, then there is going to be evidence she had an underlying mental disorder. JMO
I think the family asked friends not to speak to the media.No of course not, nor do I. I mean on MSM?
Yet some are saying that her praise of him on FB is not real, that she was just trying to get him to stay.He did do housework. If you dig hard enough on FB you will hear her complimenting on how he has learned to hang clothes instead of dry them.
Thank you MyBelle.Well said.
When does that usually stop them though!I think the family asked friends not to speak to the media.
IIRC @isalybra said NUA did her TV interview with the family's blessing.
Child custody laws may not allow her to leave state and uproot them from their father since her job is not placed by location. Adulterous relations don’t matter in divorce there I don’t believe . He had a great record no abuse why would she be allowed to uproot themWhat I meant is that it would be very easy for her to do the same job from her relatives' house, for instance, and maybe it would even be more productive because of child care help from extended family. He had to do his job where he was or go through a big deal of relocating. I am talking about who would be more affected by loss of house.
Personal attacks are. Rebutting theories is not.RBBM - I believe attacking is against TOS. IMO
My kids have a neb. Never been diagnosed with asthma.
I gathered that it meant attacking their argument.RBBM - I believe attacking is against TOS. IMO
So, in that analysis both of them would have an underlying mental disorder, one for killing her children (per CW) and the other for killing her and Nico, desecrating all the bodies and destroying forensics to make himself look better.There has been much speculation that CW has a personality/mental disorder and that's why he so easily murdered his children and threw them away. But if SW murdered her children as CW claims, then there is going to be evidence she had an underlying mental disorder. JMO
I gathered that it meant attacking their argument.