Elliot_Alderson
Well-Known Idiot
Does the defense have a reconstruction expert they will be calling? Will their expert have just learned how to read this data as well?
Yes. And the defense alleged pretrial the safety system logged zero impacts or collisions.If her vehicle has a safety sensor to stop from hitting something (connected to the rear camera system?), wouldn't there be data on that as well?
I was just going to point this out as well.So wait, did I read that correctly? We’ve gone from she hit JOK at 24 mph to she hit JOK at 97 mph?
She gave a scientific answer that the defense attorney skillfully used to imply that meant the glass "stood alone" implying it came from some third party. But that is not exactly what she said. She did say there was no physical match to the cocktail glass (jigsaw puzzle fit) but she also said there were physical matches to the glass on the ground outside the home. It is entirely possible for the glass on the bumper to be able to physically match the glass on the ground and for neither sample not to have an edge that matches anything on the cocktail glass or other fragments and for it still to have come from that cocktail glass. The entire mass of the glass was not recovered.None of those pieces of glass on the bumper matched the cocktail glass.
This needs to be stated 10 times per day so that people don’t miss this important fact.
'Consistent with being hit by a vehicle', the same vehicle equipped with a camera that takes pics when a strike occurs, but no pictures were taken?
Edit: Going the distance of 94 feet at 24 mph on a road probably becoming sloppy seems really risky, let alone dangerousSo wait, did I read that correctly? We’ve gone from she hit JOK at 24 mph to she hit JOK at 97 mph?
'Consistent with being hit by a vehicle', the same vehicle equipped with a camera that takes pics when a strike occurs, but no pictures were taken?
Thank goodness this accident reconstructionist is also an ME, like Proctor, and Bukhenik, and at least one other witness that tried to toss in their opinion.
I have a very hard time believing that nobody heard the engine revving, saw any skid marks, etc... plus the fact that there are no time stamps make this whole report suspect. 97 mph in reverse would have left a much bigger "crime" scene than there was. JOK would have been in much worse shape than he was.@BienickWCVB
Paul says tis chart shows Read's vehicle travelled just over 97 miles per hour in reverse. Says this data is "consistent with a pedestrian strike."
View attachment 510351
Wouldn’t it need to be known where JO was facing in order to determine how his injuries were consistent with a counter clockwise motion?