The release of the
Aung Family Statement certainly aligns with some of my suspicions on the family dynamics (which I'd hesitated to speak of here, since we're supposed to be victim-friendly, and both AA's family and SAH's mother are both considered victims).
From the Aungs' Statement...
View attachment 510281
So here we have two young adults with lots of things that they say they
intend to do in the future, though for whatever reason, they have not yet. AA could have joined the National Guard at 17 with parental permission, or at 18 on his own. Why had he not yet? NC had not yet taken the LSAT or been accepted to a law school, which many "responsible, resourceful, smart" students would have done prior to graduation. (LSATs are generally taken 9-12mo prior to starting law school.) Why had she not yet?
"they acted on Seraya" - to me, this is admission that AA's family knew there was a plan to take SAH.
View attachment 510288
"
she kept their home like a pigsty... complain of having to pick up after dirty diapers" - and yet AA was living in this home as well, so was it not his responsibility to provide his daughter with a clean living space? Why should the task of housekeeping fall solely on the mother?
View attachment 510290
"family court system in the United States is a disaster" - because it doesn't favor YOU? Most States will generally try to keep both parents involved in their children's lives, if at all possible.
Samara's half-brother - some
extremely heavy allegations here.
View attachment 510293
domestic violence in their family - and yet the text states that Samara refused to stay with him because of that, which to me, shows the
right choice. (After all, we can't help who our family is, but we can certainly set healthy boundaries with them, such as
I'm not going to stay with him. Also, medication and therapy? GOOD things.
View attachment 510295
View attachment 510296
We do not vaccinate - So they're saying that, even though AA's family paid a PI to dig up all this ugly dirt on SAH's mom and her family about drugs and SA, they only got 50/50 custody because they don't vaccinate.
I'm calling BS on that. IIRC, Idaho had one of the
lowest vaccination rates during COVID. As of 2023, it had the
highest rate of vaccine exceptions in the USA. This is NOT the full story.
totalitarian government - Just because a government does not give you exactly what you want does not mean they are totalitarian. Using that term in this case is absurd. AA's issue here is with the Idaho state court system, not the "United States government" or any other centralized governing body that's trying to control them by force. (And with the earlier indication that this was a "private custody agreement," it sounds like the problem is really that they don't want to stick with what they themselves previously agreed upon.)
Totalitarianism is a form of government that attempts to assert total control over the lives of its citizens. It is characterized by strong central rule that attempts to control and direct all aspects of individual life through coercion and repression. (britannica.com)
View attachment 510297
