The ballistics expert witness, Paul Griffiths, said that to fire Lynn's shotgun, the user would need to manually load the magazine, rack the bolt-action and then kock it before releasing the safety mechanism and then pulling the heavier than average, 3.95 pound trigger.
Griffiths conceded the trajectory of a shot hitting Carol Clay from where the scuffle was alleged to have occurred was plausible but did he concede it was plausible the weapon would go off inadvertently during a struggle? Assuming of course that it was first plausible that Russell Hill had loaded the weapon and factoring into that that it was dark and the weapon was setup for a left handed person? Don't forget that pesky guy rope and loud music intended to annoy either.
The defence would have us believe Russell Hill was a modern day Houdini.
(I was forced to spell a word in the 1st paragraph incorrectly as the correct spelling wasn't acceptable here)