My comment was about how people think negatively upon those who are paid to appear as an expert in court cases. I was just making the connection that every single person in that courtroom is being paid for their participation. So I don’t find it to be immediately distrustful just because someone is being paid for their special expertise that they’ve spent their lifetime building. IMO
It is the snapshot that is irrefutable. Because it places AW in the same frame with BG. So BG was with AW who is talking to LG who is recording within moments of being ordered DTH from which her phone records only 18 minutes of movement. The CAST report for what else it registered will be chilling. Eerie. Awful. MOO.I
It was a local as they thought - but they couldn't pull it together. Imagine that RA handed a lot of the sheriff deputy's their prescriptions as they checked out.
Even if you don't think prosecution gets it right, I think it's reasonable to put weight, as I stated, on the prosecution's theory.
I don't take careful notice of the guy in the photo department giving me my prints. I'm quickly opening the envelope to see the pictures. And imagine how emotional the family was at that time. They are not expecting that the violent killer is handing them the funeral photos.
IMO I think that we should be looking at what the evidence actually says and not which side is presenting it.
Yes I know it was. I read your previous post too.
Of course. If I gave the impression I don't look at evidence, that was a huge mistake on my part. But I do put weight where it is merited.
Yes, it is often surprising how much they are holding back.
Does that go for You-Tube content creators too? I've seen some speculation that some shouldn't be trusted because they make money doing the shows.
Yep. I'll never assume we know much.
In a hearing though like in a trial, the evidence of testimony, questions posed to witnesses by either side, prosecution or defense, give great and necessary context to the testimony. Also the demeanor of the questioners can also aid the jury, ie Attorney BR raising his voice for effect or to jolt a witness or Prosecutor NMcL cool as a cucumber cross of a stubborn witness...all in front of a jury done for particular reasons. AJMO
I totally think the Odinist story got airtime was because people found it fascinating. I don't think legit content creators (including mainstream outlets) believed it was a viable theory.....but it got clicks so they covered more than what they originally intended. And because it was widely covered, some people thought it was believable.
I don't even find it fascinating, to be honest.
No worries. It’s easy to misunderstand each other!
And maybe that was a twisted thrill for him? We don't know.
Perfectly written !!!!There's only one guy in the vid taken by Libby on that bridge. There's only one guy who admitted to being on that bridge. Coincidently, that same guy, the one who admitted being on the bridge, also admitted dozens of times he killed the girls.
I've followed this case for years, since the beginning. All potential scenarios crafted by the human mind have been discussed ad nauseum.
There was no grand meeting in the bottom land that day. Those girls were marched down a steep embankment, through a wooded area next to a stream, across the stream, up a rather steep bank, and in to an area of bottom land not unlike all other wetland/bottomland along streams throughout the world.
This is where they were murdered. There was no tour bus parked above in the cemetery, no group of cars, no vans, no nothing reported to that effect, via witness or cam.
I've personally studied the terrain, followed the rail track, followed deer creek, thought of escape by raft, boat, and canoe, pondered escape via bridge creek, wondered about accomplices, thought maybe they were squirreled away in a car waiting on the driveway under the bridge, heard of the shack, the runes, the rabbits, the puppies, the swords, the guns, the artifacts hanging from the trees, the searches....I could go on, like I said, ad nauseum.
Never has another person been charged. Never. Yeah, I thought maybe KAK and company, but hey, I thought too of numerous others, a guy from Kokomo, a father son team, a relative, somebody at a factory, a serial killer, a trucker, a man just passin' through, a local politician, a judge.....again, ad nauseum.
Yet here we are. One guy on the bridge in the video. One guy admitted he was on that bridge. One guy admitted to killing the girls....with details known only to the killer.
He's busted. Game over. Done deal....if it was typed by me, which it was, then assume it's my opinion
Something he had ZERO authority to do. Maybe he paid for them himself. But still.
