Search results

The panel of pediatricians said there was evidence of long term sexual abuse, remember the eroded hymen. How can this be disinformation from the Boulder police, it came from a physician panel? I think that most of us can google cases where children have been sexually abused or abducted...

I disagree, Karr was exonerated because he was NOT IN BOULDER on the night of the crime, not even in the state of Colorado.

If this was a sex crime committed by an intruder why didn't he rape the child? While there WAS evidence of long term sexual abuse found, and the child was assaulted w/the paint brush, leaving a tiny amount of blood, she was not raped by a man? Why not? This fact seems to me to blow the...

I guess this means we are entering the phase when unidentified skin cells on a murder victim's body trumps any and all other evidence in a case. The victim has unidentified DNA under the fingernails. Not guilty. Unidentified skin cells on their clothes. Not guilty. Unidentified DNA...

For what possible reason would the Boulder PD start out with a bias against the Ramsey family and then try and basically frame them, considering Ramsey's money and influence? This just rings hollow to me, its what every person accused of killing a family member always says...poor me, the cops...

If it was semen I would agree with you, but my understanding is it's not. I think your scenario flies in the face of what the typical pedophile does who does not know his victim, e.g. a family member or a neighbor. So, to me the choices are thus: 1) Believe the majority of the evidence...

It was never going to be solved. The Boulder DA's...none of them have ever wanted to prosecute the Ramseys. This is why the evidence was so selectively presented to the grand jury, to ensure they wouldn't indict and why no report, if I am remembering right, was issued. This DA has said from...

Okay, so you think the intruder knew the family and was a pedophile. So, instead of taking the girl out of the house, this pedophile spends quite a bit of time abusing her, restraining her, paintbrushes...all of the tools he wanted were right there in the house...then taking her clothes off and...

Not for me, the totality of the evidence tells me that it was not an intruder but a member of the Ramsey household that staged the kidnapping.

And who is going to ritualistically abuse a child in their own home who wasn't meant to die and who doesn't bring any of his or her own instruments?? My opinion is that the restraints, tape, garrott were all done after she was unconscious, and the "perp" --that's a hysterical Patsy Ramsey in...

I don't think this is going to change anybody's mind. THe people that have always thought the Ramsey's were not guilty are going to feel vindicated and claim now there is "proof" of innocence. The people that have always believed one or both of the Ramsey's were guilty are not going to...

Think about it, WHY on god's earth would an intruder REDRESS the child? Give me a break, it makes no sense on its face. This intruder, breaks into the house, abuses the girl and then puts her clothes back on?? For what purpose?

Yes they do. Home invaders are looking for money and thrills. So, they will usually abuse and or kill all members of the family and then steal whatever they can. Often they kill everyone in the house. Pedophiles want to have sex with children. They either abuse children they have...

Why not? He saw her, took her and killed her. It fits the profile of the child abductor to a T. Just like David Westerfield. He took her to somewhere he considered safe....since he knew everyone in the house was drugged up white trash and he would have no problem, and he didn't. Abused her...

The problem with the intruder theory is, it doesn't make sense and it doesn't fit the evidence...the only answer is 'we don't know how or why but killers make no sense'... The unknown DNA on the panties was already known, I don' t see how this changes anything, or certainly how this...

I think the odds of a kidnapper so dumb he doesn't have a ready ransom note teaming up with a pedophile so dumb he kills his victim before getting her out of the house are billions to one. There are always unexplained pieces of evidence, random unidentified DNA under the victims fingernails...

All but the real crazies have an intrinsic logic. The pedophile does not write ransom notes, neither does the home invader. The burglar doesn't go through an elaborate ritualistic abuse and murder of a child. The kidnapper steals the child and come to the house with plan, including a...

Who wrote the note? The "intruder"? It wasn't the behavior of the Ramseys it was the fact that the ransom note was written in their house, on their memo pad, using their pencil with a practice note discarded in their waste basket. And the fact that the "intruder" spent a lot of time with...

Ditto.

This seems more reasonable to me than believing an intruder wrote the ransom note since its not semen that was found but DNA from skin cells which only means touch the clothing..at least thats how I read the letter.