I do not have a record of what was removed. It seems that you removed a factual post about a mother's knowledge of her son. She was not speculating about the family. She was speaking factually about her own family. Ironically, the poster's connection was that 12 year olds do not possess the...
Admittedly, my depiction was sensational. My apologies to the area. Nevertheless, I muted the depiction portrayed by MSM.
Is it not the case that an intruder commits an intrusion? I did not intend any meaning beyond that.
LE would be remiss to not search the Internet for information...
I don't have time to verify my memory at the moment. But I thought it was an early PR hosted by the original PR LEO that asked for restraint about postings and pictures on the behalf of a request from the family. The word used may have been "derogatory" instead of "negative."
I am not certain why you are asking this. There are alerts and advisories referencing an intruder. Perhaps you noticed that there does not appear to be an entry in the Sheriff's Log for an event on Rippon Road. I don't know what to make of that. Entries for 911 hang ups are riddled through...
In an early PR, it was reported that the family requested that photos not authorized by the familty not be posted and than derogatory posts not be made.
There have been approximately 1000 posts to this forum. Early on, there was a poster on this forum identified to be from the Valley...
I don't know. I am sitting comfortably 3,000 mi away. Nevertheless, I am ginger about what I write. Folks get hungry. Folks get even.
A sheriff log report from 4/28/13
http://sheriff.co.calaveras.ca.us/Portals/sheriff/Logs/Daily%20Logs/Daily_Log_04-29-2013.pdf
07:20 Vandalism...
The suspect alert time:
Saturday April 27th, 2013 :: 02:08 p.m. PDT
The Sherrif Log:
http://sheriff.co.calaveras.ca.us/Portals/sheriff/Logs/Daily%20Logs/Daily_Log_04-28-2013.pdf
14:52 Suspicious Person 130427059
Occured on Hartvickson Ln, Valley Springs. Disposition. No Report Taken...
Is it known that she lied? Recanting is not admission of a lie. She is said to have "refused" to work with the sketch artist. On what basis was her earlier description discredited? To spin this as positive for the investigation; hmm....
Consider area description from the snapdragon post #261
One day prior to "shelter in place."
http://nixle.com/alert/4993324/
"Sheriff dispatch received multiple 911 calls around 1335 hours today (4-26-13) for a possible structure fire near the area of South Burson Road and Dana Road."...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qjDhpJhmc4g
"...she refused to provide a description"
"...clear that the witness is no longer credible"
"...did not show any indication of why she recanted."
"...we are unaware of what her mindset is."
"...the statement has been deemed non-credible."...
Additionally;
00:34:23 >> Oh, yes, yes, we have taken pretty much -- we have taken quite a bit of furniture et cetera from the home and are in the process of having them processed.
00:34:36 >> Judge Jeanine: Sheriff, tha so much for joining us and good luck with that investigation.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.