Search results

Sherlock, the poll here still exists and has much input from people with opposing views of the case who do not post on this thread - and the results of that poll show that Websleuths is divided, though not equally. There is no way to know why people who posted here in the early days do not...

I disagree. If Stefanoni were aware of the scrutiny her work would fall under she wouldn't have been busted by the independent experts for her numerous errors which were so obvious on the video of the evidence collection. Are you saying their report is just a bunch of "<modsnip>" theories? If...

I think particularly with this case, they didn't expect the high level of scrutiny that they're work has fallen under.

On the wrong night.

I suppose that's true if you don't ever look at the prints side by side.

Meredith Kercher wasn't in a coma. I don't see anything that would elongate the emptying of her stomach between the start of her meal at 6 and when she arrived home at 9.

I believe the original point was that your correction of SMK calling the lay judges "jurors" when they are, in your opinion, "judges" is misleading. If one were to go off your explanation one would think these judges are all experts with some sort of judicial training, when in fact, as SV has...

Do you regard as highly the independent experts hired by Hellman?

So no explanation for how Amanda's second toe is significantly longer in her reference print than the Luminol ones, or how Rafaelle's big toe is mushroom-shaped in his reference print but not on the bathmat, other than "'cause the court said so"...

Sollecito's big toe is mushroom-shaped. Why isn't the one on the mat as well if it's his?

Ann must not be aware that Donald Trump is no liberal... She also isn't aware that much of the Italian press has been critical of the prosecution's case. She seems to be only peripherally aware of the facts of this case as she makes quite a few errors in her article.

More interesting tweets: http://twitter.com/#!/mchancecnn yfrog.com/kigsmywj http://twitter.com/#!/Candace_Dempsey

LOTS of craziness today... http://twitter.com/#!/BLNadeau

So that's 43 samples taken from everywhere except Kercher's room. Not very much. Regardless, that's not what my post was about. I believe the independent experts, who have no stake in the outcome, have already discredited Stefanoni, and she continues to embarrass herself by revealing...

Whoops, here you go: http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2011/09/06/general-eu-italy-knox_8661397.html No, I'm not saying his DNA was on the mop. I'm pointing out that it appears Stefanoni is not being truthful about how her team handled evidence in this case. And more than the mop was...

And yet we have ILE bringing the mop from the hall closet into the murder room within that period as seen in this video: Forensic Expert Patrizia Stefanoni Gift Wraps A Mop - Amanda Knox Case - YouTube

I agree wholeheartedly with this sentiment:

Multiple problems with the "glass on top of the clothes" argument. 1. No photos exist of said glass on clothes. It's disputed whether there was actually any. 2. The couple articles of clothing under the window very likely could have already been there when the window was broken. 3...

DNA left at crime scene + suspect placing himself at crime scene = DNA evidence inarguable.

You say "That is his job to make sure that the conviction is beyond all reasonable doubt," as if any judge would do the same... but Massei didn't grant independent review of the DNA evidence. And that's the difference being pointed out between these two judges. As far as the other evidence, I...