OK well, it seems to me (from what I know for certain) that JY and NUA will have had a professional relationship or acquaintance. Both their companies will have worked with each other. In fact they are working together on a project in Bristol.
But what if his involvement was to direct Jo to someone else who did have drugs?
Ecstacy use is prevalent in the UK. So in cannabis use.
MW could have tried to line up someone for her. Equally, one of the guys in the pubs she visited could have organised for someone to come round. Or...
For this reason: if it was a new dealer, there will have been text message contact the police would be sure to follow up.
If it was a regular guy/girl, then Greg would know who it was.
It wouldn't have been a surprise as she would have had to tell Greg that she was having to wait at home...
It would be quite common. Recreational drug use is quite common in the UK even among athletic types.
This might raise the possibility of a drug dealer murderer. Might also explain why she left the pub early and why she didn't go to the christening. She had an appointment with the dealer...
I believe her interview was sought by the Police for publication because they believe the killer knows her well and might have buckled under his conscience.
I think it was probably very hard for her to do. She was quite brave.
Dear Enqueteur,
There are sadly no good answers to these questions.
There is on the other hand, no realistic evidence that they argued or had a bust up.
One can only conclude that JY didn't get on with GR's brother or family members attending.
But for Greg not to call round asking...
I'm not so sure about that. Everything fits GR. The cycle route. The tidying up in the flat (for which we have indications only admittedly). The timing of the first police call. Access. Opportunity.
The motive? Jealousy and a mistaken impression given of a text message from CAG...
Its very difficult to see today's police statement as anything other than an appeal to GR's family.
its all very sad. But of course it makes sense. Everything fits and points to GR.
Dear Equationgirl
I can't agree with this. Some of the speculation is off the mark - some of it is way off! But you can't attack a problem through the lens of social desirability bias.
I.e. you can't worry about causing offence in seeking the truth.
We want to find where the truth lies...
Couldn't agree more. Thats why the Forensic Service was there doing the second ultra sophisticated survey. I read somewhere that the equipment used was said to be able to find prints and patterns that other systems couldn't.
Unfortunately the plans won't show much - but they will give the...
I agree. But we are in fact actively and forensically debating the prime suspects. Many aspects of this crime are now quite clear in my mind. GR's innocence. CJ's innocence. We're doing a good job actually. Lets keep it up!
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.