Sweep the cat
New Member
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2011
- Messages
- 119
- Reaction score
- 0
Have been away for a couple of hours and 4 pages to catch up on. Well done Sleuthers
Miss Scott also said that it was not unusual to go for a couple of days without Jo returning a phone call.
"Jo was useless with her phone, just like me," she said. "If you texted one of us you might not get a reply for quite a while."
....if I was asked to someone's place for cider and pizza and turned up to find my host heating a Tesco's pizza in the oven I dare say I would be slightly annoyed. But not enough to kill.
b) Three's a crowd?[/U]
A photo of the three of them together 22 seconds into this video: http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/UK...tect-In-Bristol/Article/201101215892709?f=rss
.
what three of them? that snap is not greg reardon
what three of them? that snap is not greg reardon
I assume that human dna and feline dna is easily distinguishable? just wondering if saliva could have been Bernard delighted to see her when she arrived home.
Hi TulipaNoir, and welcome to WebSleuths!
And to anyone else new I may have missed overnight or otherwise:
:Welcome1:
I don't think the body was removed to one location and then afterwards moved to final dumping site. One reason is that anybody given more than a day to think about where would be a good location to move it to would think of somewhere better than Longwood Lane.
The dump site appears to be just so rubbish that I can't believe it was thought about for a long time.
The police may be almost certain of who it is, but not able to charge him at present
I posted on this before, but it seems a long time ago, so here goes. What strikes me about the events of 20/12 is not so much the parents' statement, but the immediate police response. A missing 25 year old is going to be pretty low down the list of priorities at midnight on a sunday night, yet the response was immediate. We know the police turned up at the flat that night, and that someone was actively working the case at 4am. Now that is not a normal response to an adult not being home on a sunday night. I am convinced that Greg, or one of the parents, gave information to the police in that midnight call which was so serious that it provoked an immediate police resonse. And this was never at any stage handled as a missing person enquiry, right from the start there was a clear assumption of a worst case scenario. Something in the flat (missed by Greg?) alerted the parents, and was so serious that the police went into serious enquiry mode straight away. Well, that's my take on it anyway. And I think the parents said they had been told by the police not to say what had given them such concern? Can't find a link right now, sorry.
To me it's more to do with the fact that they put 70 officers on the case and that they didn't give a description of what Jo had last been wearing.
If anybody can find me an instance of a missing person inquiry where they don't tell you what the person had last been wearing, I'll eat my shoe.
Could also explain...what seemed an 'over the top' reaction from Greg...and crying by her mother..at the first police appeal. They could indeed have found something which indicated...byond doubt...that Jo was dead and not a missing person......but what?
Oops, apologies - will go check again :waitasec:
Not sure if this is greg or not, however, I do wonder and some of you might not like this much.
The friendship between Jo and her friend goes back 10 years, they went to Uni together, on their first holiday together and camping together. Now, being of warped mind etc. was this friendship more than a friendship and was her friend dumped for Greg at some time. This then brings the slant of obsession into focus. it was the friend that knew that Jo was was on her own for the weekend.
I will leave you all to think about the rest.
Sorry if this offends but I have a strong feeling a woman is very much involved and this theory fits.