Search results

A friend of mine who posts here informed me I was being talked about. Thanks for the concern.

Please leave my name out of this. I am not Arkansas Time Traveler nor do I subscribe to his belief/theory. Thanks.

Same. I think only one former poster, who many here respect, made a claim about a gun existing. He had good research but I am not sure if there's truth to this claim. Nor how he would find out about it if he wasn't LE himself.

Just curious if this applies to detective Asher too?

31393CF0112 - ST V STEVEN EUGENE GARRISON Not posting publicly, but you can request/read them yourself. Start with Case Net.

Why was a multi-offender felon given a really low bond to go talk to cops about this case and this case only? One that was linked to Suzie via Recla/Clay? After having an illegal firearm to boot...?

No I just add more because I don't want to keep posting back to back. It's not a big deal and I'm never lying. The only non-fact I ever stated was Culley's/Community center. And I happily owned up to it. The other things are directly from Mike's posts.

Did Cathe work at Foxy's and Pink Cadillac? Answers are in the 1993 gun charge.

Mike had to "grow up" from 2012 to 2015? Not buying it. It took him from age 40+ to decide Suzie was a friend?

How can truth come from retracted and opposing statements? Mike will gain a lot more credibility when he discusses his relationship with Garrison and how he and his friends became to know him. Dusty is directly connected. Mike bought weed off him. Garrison had weapons around Mike, and the...

Did he lie about Bartt? You're conflating agenda with truth. Bartt admitted to being hammered. Asher said "sloshed" so where was the lie? On the topic of mentioning Joe... maybe the "tabloid show" edited it out. Exclusion isn't a lie. And you don't know what was said off camera.

Not even once. Bartt said he never seen info one way or another. Ms. Clay is sticking with Mike's story. No answers on why ex-detectives on the case are wrong but Clay is right.

Are you always disingenuous? I have proven every claim. What lies did I "repeat?"

Where was I hostile? Because I want to know the truth between Asher and Clay's opposing statements? I have two emails pending with LE and I hope to god they respond about the car. I will be posting to the forum asap when they do. And I have footage of Asher in the message.

Then why does Asher say it was used? He has info you and Bartt don't simply have.

Not even worth my time. People can read our posts and decide for themselves who has more research and interest in the truth.

Quote from Clay: "I couldn’t tell you off the top of my head what year Suzie’s car was, if it was brand new or if she bought it used. I just remember Dusty picking me up in it one day and we drove around for a while. It was a quick little car. When I asked why he had her car he said it was a...

Yes, but he drove Suzie's car a lot in those days. He picked up Mike in it without Suzie present. They did indeed ride alone in the car.

Thanks for clarifying. I never believed those things said about you anyways. If none of the grave robbers had a car (Mike said this) then it seems likely that Suzie's car could have been used at one point. Mike did say in the past that Dusty loved driving it because it was a "GT." (his words)...

Missouri Mule, Drugs makes more sense than any other angle. Many multiple kidnappings have to do with drugs on some level or another. Money owed. Or keeping people quiet. And the motive to kidnap Suzie because of possible testimony is about the most plausible one I can think of.