Concerned Papa
New Member
- Joined
- May 10, 2009
- Messages
- 2,708
- Reaction score
- 24
Thanks for the welcome To clarify, I see that is his point, but my question is where does the notion of hiding come from in the first place? When I read the snippets from the interview, I don't see a suggestion that Trayvon had been hiding or that George didn't see him approach from the left. So why/how does "no place to hide" come into play in the first place? As I read it, George was approached from the left, TM made no effort to hide, and GZ saw him, heard him and responded to him. Who said TM was hiding is my question, I guess. I probably not being very clear :/
eta: okay, I went back and read your post. Am I understanding correctly that the hiding part comes from OP'er?
The implication of hiding, jumped from behind, approached from behind for a surprise attack has been there from the beginning in the Zimmerman version of events. Theres thousands of articles on the net quoting or referencing one descriptive phrase or another as part of his explanation.
Zimmerman gets out of his car. He comes around the building. Trayvon is hiding behind the building, waiting on him.
http://www.publicbroadcasting.net/w...ayvon.Martin.Before.the.world.heard.the.cries
In his version of events, Zimmerman had turned around and was walking back to his SUV when Trayvon approached him from behind, the two exchanged words and then Trayvon punched him in the nose, sending him to the ground, and began beating him
http://articles.orlandosentinel.com..._1_miami-schools-punch-unarmed-black-teenager
IMO, you can take your pick as to the descriptive metaphor, but I've got a problem understanding how any form of "come from behind" attack could be likely in such a wide open scenario.