strawberry
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2009
- Messages
- 12,052
- Reaction score
- 2,741
From HLN this morning...
Trayvon Martin's family wants Zimmerman's his bail revoked. One of his attorneys says that Zimmerman had the responsibility to correct his attorney.
"We are emphatically saying this his silence was an indication of untruth. When he heard the testimony that he had no money, that he had no money raised in this website, he knew. Whether he communicated that to his attorney, whether his attorney solicited that information from him or not, he knew what the crux of the matter was at that bond hearing and he, like his apology, was insincere in his silence as well as what he said to the court."
I was thinking about that this morning wondering if the judge would revoke his bail. If what O'Mara says is true, and I tend to believe him, he said that Zimmerman was indigent based on what Zimmerman told him. Isn't that perjury on Zimmerman's part? I know in the FCA case the SA would argue that "Ms. Anthony stated in her motion" even though the motion was written by the attorney...it was filed on her behalf.