One thing that really really really bothers me about George's interview is that he states how they almost always watch Caylee.
But...
It's completely normal on the last day he saw them that Casey is leaving to a job he probably knows she doesn't have. Or that she's just spending all her money? He seems comfortable having Caylee staying with a nanny that nobody knows. No emergency contact number, etc. If she had a nanny, would Cindy have at least picked Caylee up at the nanny like once? I mean why drop her off at Cindy's work? That just seems really crazy to me.
If George had suspected for a couple of years that Casey did not really have a job, then why didn't he investigate this in the course of 2 years? No, something is definately wrong in this - as you say - no contact numbers, etc.
Just does not wash with me. I am highly suspect of ALL statements from Lee, Cindy, and George. I still maintain that George found what Casey had done and buried Caylee's body for her. Then he (George) told Casey that she, and even he as an accomplice, could go to jail for the rest of their lives if they told ANYONE what had happened, IMO. They would always have to stick to their individual stories. George, as ex-LE would do ANYTHING rather than go to jail, IMO. He knows exactly where he put Caylee and will NEVER give it up, IMO. I also do not think that even Casey knows where George placed her. I do not believe for one moment that George would have just thrown Caylee in a hole and thrown dirt on top of her. I think he did bury Caylee as carefully as he could. This is eating him alive, IMO, and I think he is more likely to commit suicide than to ever tell his part of it. He is ex-LE and knows the demeanor of criminals. IMO, he allowed emotion in his voice during the recorded interview because he knows that to be otherwise would put him in a bad light. He really did love Caylee, and perhaps allowed that emotion into his interview.
Cindy is an agressive, angry person. I feel that she probably told Casey that if she was leaving and taking Caylee with her that she could NOT take anything with her that had been paid for with her (Cindy's) money. I actually worked with a guy who was getting a divorce and the couple agreed to let the 14 year old decide which parent she wanted to live with. The soon to be ex wife said she (the daughter) could live with her Dad, but could not take one single thing with her that she (the wife/mother) paid for. Not the same thing as is in this case, but there ARE people like that.
I honestly think that Cindy knew when she wrote her July 3rd entry on MySpace that she was actually grieving for a child she knew was dead, IMO. I believe that Cindy referenced the 'I have given you 30 days' remark to make Casey think she did not know. Cindy said words to the effect of 'Is that the way you want to play this?' (PLAY THIS?? VERY POOR CHOICE OF WORDS, IMO.) Casey asks for one more day, IIRC. Then Cindy states that she can get a court order. Court order for what? To produce Caylee? For me the 30 days do not fit. Cindy made these statements on the 15th of July during a 911 call. Did Cindy start on the 15th of June to produce Caylee? Caylee was at the nursing home with Cindy that day - Father's Day. So what is this 30 days about?
I believe the whole Anthony family knows that Casey killed Caylee. IMO, they have written a 'script' for themselves to follow and no one is going to deviate from it.
This has been a long post and I apologize for that. I am not attempting to sway anyone's opinion, merely stating mine.