He went back and forth on stuff, imo. One minute he's saying how nobody was there to protect Casey from the crowds yada, next he's telling us to question all the dollars being wasted and valuable police to arreast her.
Then he talks about trampling Casey's rights and and how if it can happen to her, it can happen to you. But I suppose if Casey can have rights to do that to her daughter then others can do it to theirs?
He says there's no reciepts no proof yada yada of the check stuff, but then later says this is simple economic crimes they've had for yada yada time. Sounds like one minute he says it's false (the economic stuff) next he seems to use them as true to support another stance.
*shrug* it was back and forth to me. I can't wait to try and get a transcript.
I call it "talking out of both sides of his mouth" - if you can't impress them with truth, you can always dazzle them with BS