OneLostGrl
I'm going against the grain- I'm going sane
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2004
- Messages
- 14,316
- Reaction score
- 29
IMO, there is no way that videotape could really help the prosecution unless KC seems angry rather than distraught. I despise KC, but as a jurror, I couldn't put any significance on the fact that she reacted so strongly even before the remains were identified, because the remains were clearly that of a human toddler, including the skull, and they were discovered just down the street from KC's house. Even the most innocent, stoic mother could easily leap to the obvious conclusion and fall apart at this news. I would.
Now, if the prosecution also had a videotape of KC's unpreturbed, indifferent reaction to the discovery of apparent remains at Blanchard Park, that could definitely sway the jury toward a guilty verdict. But that tape for comparison doesn't exist, and witness testimony won't carry nearly as much weight as a video tape, especially not in a death penalty case.
As I said at the beginning here, unless KC looks angry on the Dec 11th videotape, that tape could blow up in the prosecution's face. That doesn't mean I wouldn't love to see it, however, because it's about time we saw KC suffer instead of smirk for a change. In fact, if she's acquitted, that day will be the only time she suffered badly for murdering her child.
Naw, if she's acquitted she gets to go back home with mommy dearest.