2010.04.19 Judge Strickland IS stepping down

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
Tight boots were an homage to the black boots she wore in the infamous Fusian photos taken while Caylee was missing.

L-M-F-A-O

OMG

:floorlaugh:

I almost weewee'd on that one hahaha. :D
 
What a classy resignation. Wow. I'm impressed at how balanced Judge Strickland's reasoning is.

And a nice smackdown to the defence, and their dirty tricks. Just lovely.

I read that Judge Perry runs a tight ship. New crazy motions from the defence, a blizzard of them. Talk about a snowjob.
 
"It is the Courts most fervent hope that this promise was truthful, given the nature of our current budget.

On the other hand, the Court fears that this statement may have been merely the product of an active imagination and tight boots"

Active imagination = Baez Tight Boots = Andrea Lyons


????????

I really think the tight boots refer to the cutting off of circulation thus impairing brain function, directed towards Mason because he is the one who stated Dr. Lee was willing to be paid with oranges.
 
I read the MarinadeDave statement about Judge Perry. There is no involvement. MD simply stated he didn't like a different candidate that was running against Judge Perry a few years ago. Hope that helps!
Thank you! I was half scared to death after what we have gone through with ole Marinade this weekend and today... :)
 
"It is the Courts most fervent hope that this promise was truthful, given the nature of our current budget.

On the other hand, the Court fears that this statement may have been merely the product of an active imagination and tight boots"

Active imagination = Baez Tight Boots = Andrea Lyons


????????

The footnote refers to Cheney Mason saying "trust me", and "paying Lee with a crate of oranges" just look at the statement with the number 2, it's footnote 2.
 
I hate to see him go as he was VERY likeable, and I thought he handled the defense's charades with dignity. Bottem line is he did the smart thing legal wise. This would have without a doubt been an appellate issue, hands down. I will miss him and I hope this new judge is a hard nose!
 
I haven't read this entire thread and offer my apologies if someone has already said this or something similar.

Note to Jose Baez: "There's the devil that you know, and the devil that you don't know."
 
LOL anyone else finding that just as soon as they get done reading the "last" page, they find a whole new one has begun? And when you're done reading that new "last page" there is another to follow! Your Honor, you will be missed by many!
 
Apparently, the defense has already started refiling motions. First up, motion to remove the death penalty.
 
The allegedly racist A's will love the African - American judge I'm sure. Tee Hee.
Seriously though, a new judge won't change the verdict. Thank you JS for stomaching this case as long as you have and best wishes to BP.
 
Defense filed more motions today regarding taking DP off the table. Perhaps this was the motivation to remove the judge, to have some motions reheard? Reported on the OS article. http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news...nthony-motion-20100419,0,6017904.story?page=4
According to the article they seek a private hearing with the judge also.
"The defense team asks the court to set a hearing date as well as a private hearing with a judge, where the court "may hear additional evidence from the defense" in support of their motion."
Motions have not been filed yet on the docket or released to media as far as I know.
 
Apparently, the defense has already started refiling motions. First up, motion to remove the death penalty.

Isn't that the one when Judge Strickland said you're kind of asking me to reinvent the wheel here, to Andrea Lyon?
 
Defense filed more motions today regarding taking DP off the table. Perhaps this was the motivation to remove the judge, to have some motions reheard? Reported on the OS article. http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news...nthony-motion-20100419,0,6017904.story?page=4
According to the article they seek a private hearing with the judge also.
"The defense team asks the court to set a hearing date as well as a private hearing with a judge, where the court "may hear additional evidence from the defense" in support of their motion."
Motions have not been filed yet on the docket or released to media as far as I know.

Going on a whim...no private hearing and no removing the DP..nice try defense. AS IF we didn't see this coming from a mile away! JMO!
 
"Defense counsel who has been aware of the court's brief discussion with the blogger/Journalist for many months now, seems to have only recently lost confidence in the Court's ability to be fair & imparitial".

This tells me Judge Strickland is fully aware that CM is responsible.

When this motion was filed by CM I thought that CM did not like losing his first round in court on this case. He thought for sure he could keep JBs sale of photos/videos to ABC out of the public eye. His "trust me" was lost on JS, and rightfully so.

My sincere thanks and admiration to you Judge Strickland. WTG!
 
Excellent comment but could we just say "moved over" with a blaze? Fits a bit better methinks. It wasn't easy for him to do but only because he was laughing so hard.

I agree! I was just at a loss for words at that point, this case makes my head spin. I used the quotation marks for that reason. I certainly don't think that he went down at all! Sorry for any confusion. :blushing:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
173
Guests online
306
Total visitors
479

Forum statistics

Threads
608,873
Messages
18,246,914
Members
234,478
Latest member
moonfoundation
Back
Top