stmarysmead
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2010
- Messages
- 5,292
- Reaction score
- 16,700
Yes, the courtesy copy sent to the judge, which is available before the court had time to stamp the filed copy.
If you'll start reading at line 18 of the Motion, you'll see Houze at his finest in working for his client and for following the law:
http://media.oregonlive.com/portland_impact/other/hormanfiling.pdf
(You can also get to the actual Motion by clicking on the link in the oregonlive story--it's in the article in about the second para.)
So this is Houze at his finest.
Houze admits that the restraining order TERMINATED all contact between Mother and daughter...then he gets legally huffy that Kaine did not go soft and decide to let Baby K be reunited with Baby K. anyway. Huh?
It was his right! The court TERMINATED all contact. Sorry that Terri wasn't able to circumvent the order...just because she wanted it. How is that anything negative against Kaine. The court TERMINATED all contact. Period.
All these words like "vicious"," vilify", inflame" look silly because it was not any words of Kaine or his attorney in their legal filing that "inflamed" the public...it was Terri's OWN words. Her own actions. Her own callousness in the context of a missing child who loved her. I can't even recall one sentence Kaine's attorney wrote. She did not INFLAME me. It is Terri who is the authoress of her own "vilification."
The idea that these were highly private exchanges is ludicrous. This woman had already been the target of a police sting. She bought Bat phones because she knew she was under surveillance. She spoke outside the house and her friend armed herself with a fire extinguisher. It is in this context of KNOWING she was under surveillance that she indulged herself with these words and "photos." This is like saying someone who strips and "streaks" across the field at a Super Bowl game. was involved in a private activity and had no idea it might be televised. If Terri thought she was sexting under a veil of something like CIA secrecy...that is another reason to question her judgment to be around a child.
I submit that since the fact that the ongoing investigation(S)...(note the use of plural)....are a detriment to Terri testifying and addressing the concerns of CHILD MURDER and MURDER for HIRE...but then they must be considered a detriment to her seeing Baby K as well. Suppose Baby K saw Kyron beaten to death by her Mother...supposed she viewed a long, slow, horrific death of her Brother inflicted on him by her Mother...the sight of Terri may well traumatize her...it might cause her flashbacks, fear, emotional distress.
Since Terri cannot satisfy the Court that Baby K has not been subjected to anything like that...that Baby K, in essence, would not have something akin to post traumatic stress disorder from remembering the sound of her mothers voice mixed with Kyron's screams...then, let's side with Baby K.
Terri is very good at coping. We saw that in the sexting. She's grooving right along.
She also has some Mr. Deep Pockets funding any legal games she wants to play. She can try again when there is certainty that this Baby will not be emotionally harmed by the memories her Mother's face might invoke.
Mr. Houze should defer all his legal angst and outrage until we know FOR SURE what Baby K watched, heard and endured that day her brother disappeared.
Will he vouch with his professional reputation that no emotional harm would come to this Baby? Will he state to the public that we can hold HIM responsible?
Baby K is not expendable. One child is already gone.
Edited to add...If the choice is between Terri's rights and the Baby's mental and physical health...and Terri cannot and will not do ANYTHING to assure the court that-baby K did not witness the horrific death of her brother at the hands of her Mother...Houze is saying...hey..let's take a chance with Baby K!!!! What the heck!