Divorce papers are stamped as filed around 3:50 pm, so it only took them a couple of hours to serve her. Blindsided could be a very apt description.
Here is what we can expect next in the restraining order against Terri Horman.
As soon as Terri contests the restraining order (and I have no doubt that she will), a hearing will be held within five days of the court's receipt of those papers.
The court does hold some of these hearings immediately--that's why petitioners and respondents are required to give the court their telephone contact info, so that the court can contact both by as soon as a hearing is scheduled, as there may not be time to mail notice.
Both the petitioner and the respondent MUST appear in court for the "exceptional circumstances" hearing regarding the respondent's paperwork contesting the RO. The judge will question both--and I suppose that this will be done in open court, and that the media will be present for the hearing, unless it's scheduled in a way so that the media won't be alerted.
Here is much more info about restraining orders... PDF file, takes a second to open.
http://www.oregon.gov/Lane/docs/FAPA_Packet.03-10.pdf
I find the media reports that Terri, when questioned about whether Kaine had moved out and filed for divorce, replied that everything was fine, and the reports were incorrect, very interesting.
They said that her response came prior to her being served with the divorce papers (which happened at 6 pm).
Was she really that blind-sided? She really didn't have a clue that her husband was getting a restraining order, taking their baby daughter, and filing for divorce?
I am just so curious as to how the whole thing went down...
"further, neither party nor their counsel shall disclose the contents of the basis for the application and order without express permission of the court"
wonder if TH has been threatening to go to the media with the "contents" of such RO? There has been an uproar over this and now - no details - RO has been sealed. I can see her saying "well, I have a copy and I have some reporters phone numbers - maybe they would like to see it!" JMOhas this been posted??? re: restraining order
http://images.bimedia.net/documents/Horman_restrain.pdf
also, here is transcription of the judges comment which was handwritten at the end of the document:
Under this Oregon law, the petitioner has to show (i) that there has been physical abuse of family or household member by the respondent within the past 6 months; (ii) that the petitioner or petitioner's child is in imminent danger of further abuse; and (iii) that the respondent represents a credible threat to the physical safety of petitioner or petitioners child. The petitioner needs to show more than just a suspicion of past abuse, he needs to allege the particulars of the abuse along with dates. While the RO petition could have alleged abuse of someone else in the household, the sealing of the petition "in order to preserve the integrity of the investigation" into Kyron's disappearance implies otherwise. This is very bad news.
if one parent takes out a ro against the other on behalf of a child wouldn't DCF/HRS get involved at all?
"it is hereby ordered that access to the court file for multnomah county case number 100666086 including FTR and RTINshall be limited to the following persons or entities only, except by court order: 1-oregon courts and court staff 2- any governmental agency 3- the parties Kaine and Terri 4- attorney of record for respondant 5- law firm of gearing, rackner, and engle or the atty of record for petitioner "
I can see why Kaine got a RO, if he felt the need to protect baby girl that would do it. But why the filing for divorce in the middle of a tragic disappearance of your little boy? Does filing for divorce help to ensure a RO? Do the two somehow have to go together? TIA
Thank you, GrainneDhu..... I cannot tell you how much I regret the fact that I posted that after only skimming the document- I should have read it more closely prior to commenting on it! :blushing:
However in the papers it said he moved out on the 26th....so she had to know something was up.
wonder if TH has been threatening to go to the media with the "contents" of such RO? There has been an uproar over this and now - no details - RO has been sealed. I can see her saying "well, I have a copy and I have some reporters phone numbers - maybe they would like to see it!" JMO
http://images.bimedia.net/documents/Horman_restrain.pdf
on this document... it says on the last page (transcribed)
question: what is "FTR and RTIN"? Anyone know what that stands for??????