2010.07.15 Hearing Ruling

[Meagain]

I thought excited utterances were NOT allowed?

 

[gitana1]

Which call was Cindy saying dead body in the car?

3rd call

 

[legalmania]

Coming Soon:

http://www.cnn.com/video/flashLive/...pelineNRT0A0C102B-9FFF-43C5-BC3C-F242FB051427

 

[Gypsy Road]

So is it in or not?

 

[A_News_Junkie]

When you close us down - can you auto direct us to the new thread!!!!!!!!!

Call 3 in............. other calls not offered for truth of matter and court will give a cautionary instruction for their purpose!

State takes the day, if I am hearing correct?!>!>!?

 

[Firefly]

Dead body.....#3. Is he going to rule against this one?!!!

 

[ZsaZsa]

Which call was Cindy saying dead body in the car?

The one being debated today- the third call.

 

[trafficsUP66]

Seems judge had his decision well prepared1

 

[ynotdivein]

Which call was Cindy saying dead body in the car?

Third.

 

[Eidetic]

This is good. Let them have the first two calls... Cindy was calm.
We just need the third. The first two actually play against the third imo for the jury, so this is good :dance:

 

[Meagain]

I thought it was out (3rd call) but everyone is happy about something so IDK. LOL

 

[Kat]

What was ICA's reaction? Anyone see?

 

[faefrost]

We are happy because we won. This is what justice for Caylee looks like. The truth is coming out.

If I am hearing this right? not only did he give the state the #1 and #3 calls, but he threw in the #2, which they originally weren't going to offer in as well. Is that what he means?

 

[Bree0372]

I thought excited utterances were NOT allowed?

Excited utterances ARE allowed. No premeditation.

 

[ZsaZsa]

So is it in or not?

In- it is an excited utterance.

 

[Aedrys]

I believe it is IN!!!!!!!!!! WOOHOO! Come on HHJP, say it say it say it!

 

[A_News_Junkie]

I thought it was out (3rd call) but everyone is happy about something so IDK. LOL

Sounds to me like it is in.

 

[countzero]

ICA looks shellshocked ......

 

[MvD]

Denied!

 

[eaglemom]

call 1 and 2 not offered for truth but to determine other things - cautions SA must have purpose for statement offered by CA

Odor improper lay testimony (per defense) Supreme Court opinions don't require special knowledge or training as long as they are explained as such during testimony.

Motion denied