2010.08.24 Defense Motion to Silence the Media

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
I just realized this is not a motion. It's titled as a "Notice of Standing Objection." The last sentence of the document reads "The defense hereby renews all previous objections to said disclosure and issues this standing objection."

So, I'm thinking the defense knows this notice is really pointless for this trial because Judge Perry won't block any disclosure or gag the media. They're submitting this solely to create some issue they can appeal to a higher court after Casey's found guilty. Maybe Baez and Mason have delusions of changing the Florida Sunshine Law or even the US Constitution someday.
 
lolcat.jpg

http://www.enews.org/blog/_pics/lolcat.jpg

i love that picture
 
Are we sure this is actually what he's AGAIN whining about - the cocoa and crackers, or is it in fact that ICA's latest visitors list is all over the net and we are speculating about what those folk are doing there, and who is paying for them since we know the JAC won't approve it.

That we are speculating about his latest defense "ideas" and maybe we are getting "warmer and warmer" and Baez doesn't like that?

Makes me want to stick my tongue out and chant "we know who she's see-ing, we know who she's see-ing" because his whole rant is so useless.
Third time Defense, the same answer - denied.

So he's mad 'cause his Cocoa and Crackers defense got out? Yep, that's what I'm calling it now. Move over Twinkie Defense, there's a new defense in town that outshines even YOU!
 
IMO they are trying to get this Motion in place before they have to give all of the reciprocal discovery over: ie, their own deposition transcripts. I think they do not want the public to know the questions they are asking the potential witnesses, thus giving away their so called strategy. It is also entirely possible that they want to get this order in place before the final witness list dealine. In that way, they can be sure to have their list kept "secret" and that one special witness they have yet to name can escape public scrutiny.
 
So he's mad 'cause his Cocoa and Crackers defense got out? Yep, that's what I'm calling it now. Move over Twinkie Defense, there's a new defense in town that outshines even YOU!

:floorlaugh:
 
BBM

The status hearing is actually scheduled for August 30 at 2:00 p.m. Eastern.

The clerk's docket shows that the status hearing is at 1:30 and then at 2pm is a Scheduling Conference.

08/30/2010 Status Hearing (1:30 PM)
08/30/2010 Hearing (2:00 PM)
Scheduling Conference
 
BBM

They aren't supposed to argue motions at status hearings, BUT...there again, Baez thinks he is the exception. When winding up the status conferences, Judge Perry usually asks, "Anything else?" and sure enough, Baez attempts to get his argument in.

Lord, this next status hearing is going to take FOREVER. I'm sure there'll be another Baez tirade...great, so looking forward to THAT.

ETA: Wait, it's only supposed to be half an hour? Does Baez know this? Wow. Yeah right it's going to last half an hour...NOT!
 
http://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statutes...ing=&URL=0100-0199/0119/Sections/0119.01.html

Florida Statute CHAPTER 119.01
PUBLIC RECORDS




Title X
PUBLIC OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES, AND RECORDS

Chapter 119
PUBLIC RECORDS

View Entire Chapter
119.01

General state policy on public records.
—
(1)

It is the policy of this state that all state, county, and municipal records are open for personal inspection and copying by any person. Providing access to public records is a duty of each agency.
(2)
(a)

Automation of public records must not erode the right of access to those records. As each agency increases its use of and dependence on electronic recordkeeping, each agency must provide reasonable public access to records electronically maintained and must ensure that exempt or confidential records are not disclosed except as otherwise permitted by law.
(b)

When designing or acquiring an electronic recordkeeping system, an agency must consider whether such system is capable of providing data in some common format such as, but not limited to, the American Standard Code for Information Interchange.
(c)

An agency may not enter into a contract for the creation or maintenance of a public records database if that contract impairs the ability of the public to inspect or copy the public records of the agency, including public records that are online or stored in an electronic recordkeeping system used by the agency.
(d)

Subject to the restrictions of copyright and trade secret laws and public records exemptions, agency use of proprietary software must not diminish the right of the public to inspect and copy a public record.
(e)

Providing access to public records by remote electronic means is an additional method of access that agencies should strive to provide to the extent feasible. If an agency provides access to public records by remote electronic means, such access should be provided in the most cost-effective and efficient manner available to the agency providing the information.
(f)

Each agency that maintains a public record in an electronic recordkeeping system shall provide to any person, pursuant to this chapter, a copy of any public record in that system which is not exempted by law from public disclosure. An agency must provide a copy of the record in the medium requested if the agency maintains the record in that medium, and the agency may charge a fee in accordance with this chapter. For the purpose of satisfying a public records request, the fee to be charged by an agency if it elects to provide a copy of a public record in a medium not routinely used by the agency, or if it elects to compile information not routinely developed or maintained by the agency or that requires a substantial amount of manipulation or programming, must be in accordance with s. 119.07(4).
(3)

If public funds are expended by an agency in payment of dues or membership contributions for any person, corporation, foundation, trust, association, group, or other organization, all the financial, business, and membership records of that person, corporation, foundation, trust, association, group, or other organization which pertain to the public agency are public records and subject to the provisions of s. 119.07.
History.
—

s. 1, ch. 5942, 1909; RGS 424; CGL 490; s. 1, ch. 73-98; s. 2, ch. 75-225; s. 2, ch. 83-286; s. 4, ch. 86-163; ss. 1, 5, ch. 95-296; s. 2, ch. 2004-335; s. 1, ch. 2005-251.
 
So he's mad 'cause his Cocoa and Crackers defense got out? Yep, that's what I'm calling it now. Move over Twinkie Defense, there's a new defense in town that outshines even YOU!

Cocoa and Crackers defense! lolololol
 
Lord, this next status hearing is going to take FOREVER. I'm sure there'll be another Baez tirade...great, so looking forward to THAT.

ETA: Wait, it's only supposed to be half an hour? Does Baez know this? Wow. Yeah right it's going to last half an hour...NOT!
Maybe we'll even get to hear how he's doing with the foreclosure on his house?
 
Obviously not. After all they did try to get FL's death penalty declared unconstitutional.

Ahh yes, I remember the bizarre witness proclaiming the prosecutors were out to kill attractive women! Another classic one for this case.

At this point, I really don't see how HHJP can let this charade go on. I wonder if her has any options here? I mean, Baez may be dense but I don't think he's THIS stupid - after having been told, repeatedly, that judge perry does NOT have control over the jail and that the media will do what the media will do - and if he doesn't like it, go to the supreme court and (I think) make a complaint regarding cruel and unusual punishment...

It's as if Baez has nothing constructive or meaningful to do - he KNOWS this, and so he falls back on filing things that are comfortable to him, no matter how repetitive or nonsensical.
 
Judge Strickland's "The irony is rich" is absolutely prophetic, isn't it? The prosecution wanted the gag order in the first place, but the DEFENSE fought it.

Oh I just can't get this song outta my head!!:innocent:
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VWBSFeB7WIk[/ame]
 
Here's how I'm gonna choose to read this motion:

Dear Judge,

Since I am may no longer pursue a fortune on the likeness and story of my client and the daughter she killed, no one else should be able to use her likeness or tell her story, either.

The End-JB
 
November 25, 2008 Hearing
http://www.myfoxorlando.com/dpp/news...n_Anthony_case

"Baez, along with lawyers representing the Orlando Sentinel newspaper and various Orlando television stations, challenged the gag order. "When this case started, I expected to be on the eleven o'clock news," said Baez. Citing U.S. Supreme Court precedent, Baez said the gag order wasn't necessary. "It's a whole lot of hot air and not a whole lot of law," he said, adding "when push comes to shove, I'm going to err on the First Amendment every time."

Just in case anyone forgot..Casey was facing the Death Penalty when Baez stated the above at that Hearing.
__________________
Fast forward to August 2010
http://www.wftv.com/pdf/24746808/detail.html


#4. It has been and continues to be the Defenses position that the First Amendment rights of the media must give way to the constitutionally protected rights of accused, especially when the State seeks the ultimate penalty of Death.."
 
So the gag order was to be placed upon the Defense team and the family regarding talking to the media. But they chose to want freedom to talk to the media ($$$$$).
I get it.

A gag order then would not affect the Sunshine Law. When documents are requested by anyone, they would still be made public - is that correct?
But people related to the case would be gagged from giving interviews and such, correct?

BBM
Yes...and at the hearing Baez said he would always err on the side of the First Amendment.
 
AMEN! Enough monkey business ... geesh ... I'm thinking Jose doesn't have a good handle (or any handle) on the case if he thinks KC's purchases of cocoa and bras are going to poison a potential juror pool ... or if he thinks can convince a judge that they are ...

But, as we all know, that's not really what Jose is worried about ... he thinks he's being slick because if he can get the commissary records private, he can slip in the visit logs too and no one will be the wiser ... :rolleyes:

Maybe someone can answer this: When Judge Perry denied Jose's motion about this, didn't Judge Perry say something about it not being his jurisdiction and that it would be something for Florida Supreme courts to decide ??

Jose, quit being such a :loser: and save your brain cells for preparing for trial ... you don't have any to waste ...

BBM
I totally agree.

And I like your last sentence. :D
 
1st BBM ~ Oh I just read that the gag order would not have applied to the A family. What would be the point then? Ha!

Oh yes..Cindy was very happy to learn that the Gag Order would not apply to her...very happy indeed.
 
AMEN! Enough monkey business ... geesh ... I'm thinking Jose doesn't have a good handle (or any handle) on the case if he thinks KC's purchases of cocoa and bras are going to poison a potential juror pool ... or if he thinks can convince a judge that they are ...

But, as we all know, that's not really what Jose is worried about ... he thinks he's being slick because if he can get the commissary records private, he can slip in the visit logs too and no one will be the wiser ... :rolleyes:

Maybe someone can answer this: When Judge Perry denied Jose's motion about this, didn't Judge Perry say something about it not being his jurisdiction and that it would be something for Florida Supreme courts to decide ??

Jose, quit being such a :loser: and save your brain cells for preparing for trial ... you don't have any to waste ...

Cocoa and crackers? He better hope the Jury haven't seen the photo of his client peeing in public. Cocoa and crackers sound downright wholesome compared how she is in real life...
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
167
Guests online
279
Total visitors
446

Forum statistics

Threads
609,139
Messages
18,250,055
Members
234,547
Latest member
4TheLost& Forgotten
Back
Top