ynotdivein
Retired WS Staff
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2009
- Messages
- 11,425
- Reaction score
- 71
I pray that the judge throws out the Universal interview. If not, I think it will present grounds for an effective appeal if/when she's convicted. AZLawyer cited several cases which supports that interview being excluded.
2011.01.04 Defense Motion to Suppress Casey's Statements - Page 6 - Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community
post #129
Until I read these I was convinced that interview should be allowed into evidence. Now, I'm hoping it gets thrown out. There's nothing there that wasn't stated in her initial written statement anyway. Didn't CM cite the Ross case in his argument today? I'll have to go back and listen again and see if he used any of these.
I don't think we'll see the Universal interview allowed. But I am firm in my belief that if CJBP does allow it, it will be because he feels that there is an iron-clad support in case of an appeal.
Marina2, like you I was initially worried about throwing out the Universal statement. The more I study, though... and while the SA is doing due diligence to keep it in... the State doesn't need it, IMO.
Oh! now I'm going to be on the edge of my seat for the next hearing to see if they read here and she shows up in a shell and jacket!
Whether they are reading here seeya: guys!) or just getting the general consensus from whiffing the more-public media feedback sites... they really need to dial in her outfit. Clingy sweaters, whether turtleneck or plunging V neckline, NO. Casual business jacket YES but preferably in a dark color. And under that jacket, a no-frills, simple neckline shell either slight v-neck or round collar.
It won't do a darn thing for her fidgeting but will reduce the sleeve-tugging-over-the-hands and the clasping-at-the-turtleneck issues. :cow: