2011.05.13 - Jury Selection DAY FIVE MORNING SESSION

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
She is starting at the begining, OH NO! Time to wash the floor.....
 
#1 - she dropped out of high school without graduating when she was one credit away from graduating
#2 - she was not a good student - maybe a mediocre student
#3 - she was not a good employee - that would require having a job.

Maybe she pretended to be a good employee. :waitasec:
 
NOOOOOOO!! AF is starting over!! :banghead:
 
PJ can now consider abuse, lack of maturity, age as a mitigating factor.
 
Is it just me, or is Ms Finnell asking the same questions, over and over?

After at least 30 minutes of questioning just by her she said, "I don't remember where we were, so I'm just going to start at the beginning." Same questions. Again.
 
Nice every does not believe employment is a factor - now I think he understands!
 
My personal opinion:

I could consider any and all mitigating circumstances as long as they were proven to be true, it just may not have any bearing on my opinion.
 
I agree with him. I don't see what being a good employee would have to do with this case.
 
There she goes again with employment history. Does she know Casey's employment history?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
174
Guests online
272
Total visitors
446

Forum statistics

Threads
609,375
Messages
18,253,333
Members
234,644
Latest member
cwr67
Back
Top