2011.05.14 - Jury Selection DAY SIX (Afternoon Session)

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
posted on twitter while we were gone

Juror says if #caseyanthony didn't testify she would not hold it against her. #CaseyAnthony -fell
 
I think EVERY juror so far has been confused over this "would you consider" question. If I understand correctly, he's just asking "would you take it in to account AT ALL, even THINK of it, even if you decide that it has no bearing?" That's what I understand the question to mean. I think it is confusing for the jurors....or maybe I'm the one who has it wrong :crazy:

Well, I know I wouldn't consider it if I already decided it had no bearing.
jmo
 
Yet again, AF may as well say, "Yes, we know she is guilty, but there are good reasons!"
 
lack of maturity

guess that means your so young you think its OK to kill your child

QuoteRespect costalpilot :wave:

I have seen three years olds be tender and worried about infants in the room with them.

I know ten year olds who knew how to keep a baby safe. There have been six year olds who have saved lives by calling 911.

It is insulting to say it is because of a learning disability! We are not talking about math, here. Intelligence (what ever that is) does not show the smarts of the heart! IMHO


AF: Victim impact statement. Are you going to consider that Caylee was a beautiful baby who is deeply missed by strangers? Can you put that aside?

I think so, as a human you can empathize but you can put that aside.

AF: can you use the high standard of care you use in other parts of your life?

yes.

AF: is there anything you can think of that would keep you from being fair and imparticial?

no I am firm but fair.
 
HHJP said at 15 PJ's he will swear them in....and, if the sides want to backstrike they can do so at any time before he swears them in. It will be a race. What does that mean?? I bet JA can run faster than HHJP!
 
I think EVERY juror so far has been confused over this "would you consider" question. If I understand correctly, he's just asking "would you take it in to account AT ALL, even THINK of it, even if you decide that it has no bearing?" That's what I understand the question to mean. I think it is confusing for the jurors....or maybe I'm the one who has it wrong :crazy:

i agree, AF should 'consider' reformulating these questions
 
Oh dear. The sheriff behind ICA is chomping her gum like an Anthony.
 
State has no questions for general voir Dire.. of course Baez does..
 
JB:
you are NOT charming. get over yourself
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
138
Guests online
485
Total visitors
623

Forum statistics

Threads
608,220
Messages
18,236,457
Members
234,322
Latest member
Ps.Winck
Back
Top