2011.05.18 Jury Selection Day Nine

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
judge is so pissed and frustrated with the Defense it isn't even funny

I'm glad, he has been waaay to nice to them up to today.
Time to get down to brass tacks, get this show on the road.
 
JimLichtenstein
Juror 3283: 30-ish black with long dreads pulled back in ponytail. Wearing a nice dark suit and tie. Best dressed juror award! #caseyanthony


Wow...at least he knows how to dress for court...professional dark color suit, no shorts and flip flops
 
He has 32 tvs on at work. Usually Fox and CNN - He has seen the lawyers last week in the courtroom. Other than that, he has not seen them. He does not have tv at home.
 
JB is smirking...hinky meter off for some reason with me and this PJ
 
PJ did not appear in Court yesterday because he had no way to get there. No ride/no gas.

LDB seems a little under the weather.

PJ says there a several televisions (32 I think) around his job area. The selection of what is shown on them is out of his/employees' control. Mostly Fox and CNN shown.

Recognizes some of the SA and DT teams, but only from last week. Had never seen them before on TV.

Aside: JB sitting there with a smug little smile, watching intently (finally put down his cell phone).
 
HHJP sounds emphatic this morning! He is bound and determined to swear in a jury today! My $$ is on HHJP. :cheer:

Yes indeed I do believe we will see 12 jurors sworn in today.:great:
 
He can't watch tv at work.

He has computer access at work. But for business only.
 
Yeah, he's even being a bit short with the PJ's. :eek:

He was not happy when this PJ didn't answer his question the right way, at first. It must get really trying having to repeat yourself over and over again. I think I would lose my mind! :banghead:
 
no computer, no TV - yet he's in a nice suit. hhhmmm........... hinky, just sayin.........
 
I'm liking this guy. Sounds sincere.

Hope I'm not being naive and it isn't just because I am ready to take any 12th juror at this point.
 
huh so most people really do equate "any post on the net" to "blogging"? cause as I dont use a blog I would never have answered in the affirmative!
 
I don't believe this guy is telling the whole truth... mis-truths
 
George and cindy don't know who they are? Really, I would have said "I assume they are related to the defendant being the last name. This PJ is well prepared for the questions!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
165
Guests online
213
Total visitors
378

Forum statistics

Threads
608,936
Messages
18,247,829
Members
234,510
Latest member
Sarcon
Back
Top