2011.06.02 TRIAL Day Eight (Afternoon Session)

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
misstatements against 'the defendants council of choice' (that would be you JB).
 
JB understands the state wants them introduced because of the misstatements in them. However, he feels they should be relevant and not overly prejudicial and should not confuse the jury.
 
JMO but if the defendant's counsel could possibly obstruct justice it's relevant evidence.

Gosh, your client talks so much.
 
JB missed his deadlines to object to these videos.
 
Baez says paraphrased that there are many other videos with unfair representation of the defendant's counsel of choice... MAKE 'EM STOP!!! (that last bolded part was just me)

:)
 
Talk about pot calling the kettle black. JB: 'There are mis-statements of fact and law....'
 
He has to ask...
I sure would, every chance I got...
 
JB should have brought up these points months ago
 
Come on JB, it is what it is! Nobody can make you look bad but you!
 
:boohoo: JB objecting to jail house tapes ...
 
he can't even look at the judge..he looks down or straight but not where the judge is sitting
 
I must have missed he asked this morning? Why is my stomach churning?
 
judge can just add a stipulation before the video to disregard those comments.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
170
Guests online
2,466
Total visitors
2,636

Forum statistics

Threads
601,207
Messages
18,120,536
Members
230,996
Latest member
MiaCarmela
Back
Top