2011.06.03 TRIAL Day Nine (Afternoon Session)

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm not convinced ICA will be able to maintain her stone face when SA presents all evidence proving Caylee's deceased body in the trunk.

I disagree. She killed her and then went to Blockbuster's with Tony. She partied for a month. She wanted "one more day". She won't break, unless instructed to do so. IMHO
 
Ok folks following along on my iphone while I work. What do we think?? Was Caylee stored in the tire well? Or just laying on top of the tire well (where the spare tire should be stored)?
 
Was their a dirt road that went into the undergrowth where Caylee's remains were found?

That seems suspicious but I can't seem to work into tending to show that ICA dumped the body in the car. If she did so she would have had to leave the car at the roadside surely? Which is a good few feet from where the wooded area where the body was found.

Even if ICA dumped the body, I doubt thats where the leaves came from,.


Here in Fl, very few areas, and no wooded areas have pavement to park alongside. We have grassy (weed and sand mostly) areas where the road ends.

She'd have to have parked in that grassy area, or even deeper into the woods in order to avoid blocking the roadway.
 
OM Goodness...These forensic examiners are truly "Unsung Hero's" for all victims..not just our sweet Caylee !! Just cant find an appropriate Emo to reflect how I feel bout this :rocker:
 

LDB w/GB
pic- wheel well
pic - trunk liner - pulled outside of the trunk - yellow markers L (Left) and R (Right) side of the liner of the spare tire cover well - one continuous piece of carpet that covered the trunk at one time...
pic - trunk liner with yellow marker 12 - left side of area - marker 12 pointer showing human hair
picture of close up of human hair - attempt to photo hair -

(there are people in the gallery looking up at the ceiling . . . is there a bird in the courtroom?)

there is a red fiber - outlines hair ...identify on the left side of the liner of the trunk...
picture of blue collapsable bin w/doll and other items....
GB received items inspected - secured in evidence locker - packaged in a box.....
pic - previously admitted pic of child's pink backpack with diapers and clothing and what appears to be fruit snacks package....GB preserved this item

collected more hair from trunk....residue, air freshener sheet and preserved it.

envelope - initial = time 14:47 7/17/08 item - hair - front edge of trunk of the vehicle...
attempt to photo using tweezer w/magnifier - he seals, preserves and submits it into evidence lab....

next envelope - LDB walking back and forth between JB and podium....
identify package, name, date 7/17/08 14:40 hrs, inside trunk vehicle - air freshner sheet or dryer sheet - photo with B placard previously

small envelope 7/17/08 16:00 hrs - inside trunk - from floor - petri dish containing dirt with hair...

dirt particles 7/18/08 00:16 (midnight 12:16)

7/18/08 12:05 located inside trunk right side dirt particles with hair...



 
air freshener sheet, Blosey has identified.

LDB: if I may have "ht" for identification. This is article four. If I may approach the witness.

HHJP: you may

LDB: recognize?

yes

LDB: how

my name and the date (gives a lot of info I did not get)

LDB: and seal and put in this envelope?

sixteen hundred hours, correct.

LDB: recognize?

yes

LDB: what is it?

my name on it, interior fender left side area: is a petrie dish (sp?)

LDB: the date and time of collection

gives specific time and date

LDB: then placed in this package and sealed

correct

LDB: ?

I recognize the package 7 18 2008 12:05 located inside the trunk well area and is a petrie dish with particles of dirt and hair.

LDB: packaged and sealed?

correct

LDB: " " for identification. (long pause)
 
can someone answer if that's states evidence or ours the pic up above?
 
oh sweet jesus I never saw that one before. If that comes in evidence....well she is done. Is that the work of our people or is that SA's evidence??

Both. The original photo is SA evidence. JWG and a couple of other sleuthers enhanced the photo and drew the outline for easier recognition. This exact version will not be shown to jurors. Not sure if the SA will be allowed to do their own enhancement. I am sure one of the forensic specialist (Maybe even G. Bloise?) will be able to draw it out on the monitor as they have been doing so far.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
137
Guests online
198
Total visitors
335

Forum statistics

Threads
609,506
Messages
18,255,073
Members
234,674
Latest member
sadzzz
Back
Top