Jose is asking the witness about certain work she has done. Given her dates from her own work. Jose brings up another examination. You examined hair in that report.
I did.
JB: can you tell the jury the results?
no apparent hairs with decomp were found
JB: you were given more items?
correct
JB: you found more hairs?
correct
JA: have him specify where the hairs came from
JB: you found in the trash bags, hairs from that scenerio...can you tell the jury...
no apparent hairs with decomp were found.
Jose is going through ALL of the other evidence and getting the witness to say that there were no decom hairs found in the samples.
Jose works in the negative. What is that? How do you prove a negative?
I am sorry, but my mind will not allow itself to follow him. His thinking and what he is doing is a backward process. It is spin. :hypno: It is not truth. It is the bending of reality to your purposes, taking what is truth and trying to cloud it...
Jose says they are almost done.
All of this will be like a bad dream to the jury, later as they are riveted as the State gives the compelling evidence of that "one" hair and then the evidence of the duct tape is made perfectly clear...as I am sure LDB will do. :luv: :blowkiss: