2011.06.07 TRIAL Day Twelve (Afternoon Session)

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
Jury not present.

LDB wants to start the video at the 15 minute mark because that is when Officer Forgey comes into the picture.

JB says this is not in accordance with Harris. He feels they are addressing a matter of law with the Jury. Feels they are holding a motion to suppress hearing in front of the jury. The jury is hearing things that are completely irrelevant. If it proceeds, the matter will be made worse - matter of law as opposed to matter of fact.

HHBP 12 individuals will be asked to evaluate the believability of this testimony. They will have to decide if this or any other K-9 is reliable. The training and certification and experience all go to factors that will enable the triers of fact will reject or accept this evidence.

Previous ruling will stand.

Jury coming back.
 
IMO HHJP has a little "tell" when he purses his lips. Meaning="I'm not buying it"
 
I swear, there's times when JB talks and I can't follow a thing he says. It's really disjointed.

The DT needs to do themselves a favor and keep a tight leash on ICA - I can't imagine her playing paralegal or whatever she's up to plays well with them. I find it highly disrespectful that when someone is testifying she is either coloring or whispering. Very disrespectful.
 

JB arguing this testimony shouldn't be argued in front of jury but in front of HHBP only.....he asked previously for SA to lay predicate....but not this....

HHBP said 12 jurors have to evaluate whether to accept or reject this evidence....previous ruling will stand return the jury!



 
JB is clearly using a "source" to gain info and then present as his own..the problem with this..he uses filler words, between the info, a bumbles through it all. ack
 
Somebody mentioned JB's numerous objections in the sidebar thread:

I believe that JB is objecting to anything and everyting so that when he files an appeal it is on court record that he objected to the evidence/testimony.

I heard this the other day and then Ijust Googled it. It has to do with the appeal(s) that will be filed as soon as Miss Antnony is found guilty.
 
HHJP has to once again explain to JB what the jury's role is.
 
You know, JB has every right to object and to petition the court in a legal matter. What irks me is his arrogant disregard for the response. HHJBP is deliberate, careful in his choice of words, and polite when responding to his inquiries -- but there is JB (or just was) ignoring him as he's speaking, chatting with others, rolling his eyes -- it's beyond unprofessional. HHJBP is one patient individual. IMO
 
Somebody mentioned JB's numerous objections in the sidebar thread:

I believe that JB is objecting to anything and everyting so that when he files an appeal it is on court record that he objected to the evidence/testimony.

I heard this the other day and then Ijust Googled it. It has to do with the appeal(s) that will be filed as soon as Miss Antnony is found guilty.

Yes he needs to object to protect the record for appeal. Also the State have been objecting repeatedly as well.
 
Mr. Baez does not want this into evidence. I wonder if this is yet another video that he forgot to review.
 
I hate to say this but "yawn". I know this testimony is important but I'm having a hard time staying awake and paying attention. This makes me wonder if the jurors feel like I do.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
84
Guests online
469
Total visitors
553

Forum statistics

Threads
608,047
Messages
18,233,531
Members
234,275
Latest member
MaestraV
Back
Top