Extremely long unbroken links in signatures tend to be the culprit. It's not you.
well...this has been a waste...a huge waste! Watching this was a big fat waste of time.
Oh...and don't bother asking me to spend another dang day watching. I will listen instead. I know sweetie and I love you but nobody is learning anything from what is getting sad and I am tired of it! Don't bother trying to get anymore out of me and trying to convince me to change my mind.
Oooops, sidebars over. Let me get back to the show and we will talk later.
I hate to keep harping on this... but this woman testified during direct examination that Caylee and Casey were excluded because of this "17" and then when Jose was just back up there talking to her she said she could not exclude anyone?? Why did she say earlier that she could exclude Casey and Caylee... then switch that she could not exclude anyone?? She said it was inconclusive and she couldn't exclude anyone... WHY... then did she sit there and say that earlier?? She has my hinky meter up majorly!!
exactly correct...she appears to be playing devils advocate here.
She also reminds me a lot of Pamela Smart...anyone else see that resemblance?
Is it possible she could end up being an alternate?
I hate to ask this question but is that really possible?
Yes but some of the states was inconclusive as well ,to the jury I would think, JA's unsettled demeanor is confusing