Yes, but it doesn't break the case. So okay, the sticker wasn't important. There was still a two year old killed horribly and thrown away like trash. I don't understand why they are attacking something so little that doesn't do a darn thing towards making Casey look innocent. I'm sure that sticker is LAST on the jury's important evidence list. Good Lord. Talk about picking the wrong battles.
Well, you can make the argument that the sticker could of been something that linked ICA to the body due to the residue on the duct tape. Not that she can't be linked in other ways, but perhaps they are going the path of least resistance in trying to break those links.