2011.06.21 TRIAL Day Twenty-four (Afternoon Session)

[my2sense]

O. M. G.

 

[RedSox Mom]

Baez: Object ---->Overruled

Baez: Object.....beyond scope, didn't talk bout bones----->Overruled.

Casey sideeyes Baez, she's looking a bit ill.

BTW paraphrased above

moo

 

[BigFatMommyDog]

Wow - loci only matches/masks identical loci! COOL!

 

[yeknomaras]

Jeff... you are amazing. <3

 

[Jetaime]

So far, this appears to be the one DT witness who may escape with his reputation intact.

I agree. He is very respectful to BOTH sides, isn't argumentative (as if he has a dog in the fight, so to speak). By far my favorite DW.

 

[sleutherontheside]

JA is soooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo dam7ed SMART!!!!!

 

[1tasha]

I like this witness. He's honest and forthright.

And he's saying what we want to hear.

 

[lemon]

Yay, my bones argument just got mentioned!

 

[SurfieTX]

JA is ON right now. He has a very thorough understanding of DNA. Loci? 16, 17? Hello!

 

[Yellow Rose]

This makes me teary...she was so incredibly precious!

I would have LOVED to LOVE and RAISE this beautiful baby. I want justice for her so badly I can hardly stand it.

 

[matou]

Contamination DNA would not completely mask the original profile.

 

[liltexans]

Pros gets #caseyanthony def dna expert 2 admit it would b "very difficult 2 obtain a profile" from sample that underwent what this tape did
by abcashleigh via twitter at 1:30 PM

 

[Linda7NJ]

I love how Jeff can break it down so simply !

Jeff:rocker:

 

[greycoupon]

We have an extensive thread here on them. They've been researched by WBS'ers considerably.

Thanks, I've bookmarked to read about Tim Masters later.

 

[lowens1975]

Refresh my memory - is it warm and moist in Florida? During Summer? In a Hurricane, and a swamp?

:floorlaugh: That's an understatement. I've been here for 20 years.

 

[liltexans]

Cross: Contamination only masks same DNA-Not a different profile.
by bobkealing via twitter at 1:31 PM

 

[Mountain_Kat]

And he's saying what we want to hear.

For me personally, the only thing I want to hear is the truth. Whether that truth is pro-state or pro-defense.

 

[Turnadot]

Even if at some point he says something I don't want to hear, he's proven he's honest on the stand, IMO, and I think the jury will find him credible.

 

[BetteDavisEyes]

Witness is happy to discuss his knowledge with someone else who understands what he's talking about.

 

[illek46]

Every DT expert ends up agreeing with the state! Hmm, sounds like JB needs a new tactic!

I stand by my opinion that the only reason the DT is even having "Experts" testify is so they cannot be criticized for not doing so. Basically, CYA tactic.