Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I can NOT believe CA was doing the chloroform searches. I have observed the Ants may not be the best spellers or grammarians, but neither chlorophyll nor How to Make Chloroformcomes up in MY Google searches with the auto-type feature on. Chloroform does come up by typing in chlor about 4th in line, but no words "How to make...". Is it possible she selected chloroform by accident? Perhaps, once or even twice, but not 84 times. But then the actual phrase HOW to make chloroform is an issue, as that exact phrase was typed in the Ant's computer.
I honestly think CA's dog was ill from ICA practicing using chloroform on the dog, as a poster mentioned earlier. THAT makes sense. What would chloroform, acetone and alcohol have to do with bamboo and a sick dog. Bamboo, BTW is not toxic to dogs, per several searches, and bamboo does indeed contain chlorophyll. And why would SOMEONE delete those searches, but not others? CA did not know how to delete, so I heard.
Oh wait... I see you wrote maybe CA was searching because of her suspicions. Hmmmm.
:floorlaugh:
That was good. However, it's not MY fault those 2 can't get a job. Why are they sucking on my tax dollars, or the Floridians tax dollars? Hey George, get a job at night. Cindy? Lee?
People say "oh, they need to attend the trial, oh, they're the grieving grandparents". GMAB. They can do what the rest of us do - watch the evening recaps (unless they have to testify of course).
Will they continue to be on disability once the trial is over? This can't go on forever can it?
The whole lot of them make me so darn mad. Between the cost of the trial, and paying for the entire family on taxpayer dollars seems quite wrong.
MOO - please and thanks.
Mel
Obviously I am WAY behind here, just coming on to catch up. I just really don't think any of the A's should be allowed in there at all. This is not anything personal about THEM at all... I simply don't think ANYONE who is being called as a witness in ANY case should be allowed in the courtroom where they can hear the testimony of other witnesses before theirs is given, that's all.
However...that said, in THIS case it really wouldn't matter since it is being televised. If they weren't allowed in, the A's could still sit right in front of a comptuter or TV and see the whole thing. (And take all the notes they wanted, too.) The only difference is they couldn't see the jury and their reactions.
maybe she meant denatured alcohol? a gallon is like $13Did anyone catch Cindy saying (rubbing) alcohol can be quite expensive. I can get about a gallon for a buck at the dollar store.
:waitasec:
MOO
Mel
She could be the next America's Top 40 Hits weekly countdown radio presenter with a name like that.
<modsnip> I am thrilled with all of our new posters and great ideas and opinions.
<modsnip> there are posters here who have studied all the documents ,interviews,transcripts and hearings for almost 3 years now,<modsnip>.If you have only recently started following this case,you may have a very different view of the Anthony's,the defense,the SA's and the surrounding cast ,in this case.
If you've only followed it in the media ,well,they often get facts wrong.
It's a LOT of info to cover,but definitely worth going back and studying ,if you really want to know this case and what's going on.
Cindy Anthony's depos are particularly interesting,especially the one with Morgan and Morgan in the Zeneida Gonzalez civil suit.You will see a very different CA than what we've seen at trial. Her depo with the SA's is interesting also.
They are a very complex family and created this 3 ring circus ,along with JB,IMO.
You just can't make this stuff up!
Maybe those who have been here awhile should compile a list of the best or most important documents/videos to look at . Any takers?
maybe she meant denatured alcohol? a gallon is like $13
Rather than rewrite the bible on this case I think a great place for folks to start is at this site:
http://www.acandyrose.com/caylee_anthony_directory_index.htm
acandyrose did the most outstanding job of putting together some very important information including:
31 day detailed timeline
Casey Anthony statement and interviews
Transcripts
Live trial stream links
Who's Who
You tube links (NifterMedia is the best IMHO)
It took me hours to get through some of the info, and I had already covered most of it on my own before finding this most awesome site. I refer many to it, and they only say thank you. It doesn't lean one way or the other (it's not pro or con -- simply provides the evidence known to date).
A huge thank you to acandyrose!
MOO
Mel
I wonder if a perjury conviction would keep them from making money on this case at the end of the trial?
Perfect !
:yourock:
ETA: I'm certainly not suggesting that just because you are new you shouldn't have an opinion. I hope I didn't come across that way !
I doubt the video (which I can't find the link now) of the start of his testimony would ever constitute perjury. If he and Dr. Bass discussed it as he testified, before it was in existence, he could consider himself a "co-founder"/"co-developer" etc.. He and Dr Bass "built the facility and they began the first research together" (paraphrasing).
I would have to hear Dr. Bass say "He didn't co-found the Body Farm! It was all me!"... I haven't heard that yet, so until I do, I doubt he violated any laws with his semantics on the stand. JMOO
Seems a little harse to me. Put yourselves in their shoes wouldn't you want to be there? I know I would. As far as working perhaps they're notoriety prevents that. Not to mention the daily turmoil that they must be going through. I don't like them anymore than you do but I still can empathize with them and the situation they're in. JMO
BBM
If this is indeed fact, than I'll bet CM is the only one that felt "duty bound".
CM - the only attorney on the defense respected in the legal community. The only one that has the unblemished record.
JB - CLEARLY did NOT want to go forward with whatever the problem was yesterday. His body language could NOT have been more telling. He practically begged CM to drop the whole matter and was completely dejected once they came out of chambers.
Now, whose testimony?
My bet is Cindy.
Originally Posted by 3doglady
Before this CM was yelling at the DT when they were in back with KC. When the PT is going in back with the DT, JB does not want it on the record but JA insists. CM motioned to DS to keep KC away. DS gets the female DT to take her in another room so KC cannot read the transcript on DS laptop. The two female junior DT's are reading the laptop. Their reaction looks like something big is going on and they do not look happy. Every time the door opens where KC is, the 2 female DT's jump apart and look at door like they don't want KC to hear what they are saying. The other male DT looks nervous. While this is going on, CA reads a text and looks up at GA with clear surprise on her face. GA looks at it and says OMG. CA gets up and leaves
How could they prevent ICA from seeing what was being said? I guess to keep her from blowing up on camera? Obviously they had to tell her???
I'm perplexed!
seriously is there even a snowballs chance of perjury charges against CA?
...I wish