3:38
Jury back in at 3:39
REDIRECT EXAMINATION OF DR. FURTON BY JB - continued
(Casey looking very somber - quite a contradiction to this morning)
JB showed Dr. Furton the trash (JA at the witness stand also)
He saw a brown substance in the can and agreed it was a brown substance. It appeared to be empty. Plenty of stuff on outside of can - not a good shot?
OBJECTION - SUSTAINED (JA yelling it in JB's ear since he is standing there)
Purple residue on Velveeta container. He agreed that there is nothing visible other than the dry residue.
Do you see any maggots or puperia
OBJECTION - qualified? -
He has seen maggots before. He saw a little bit of evidence of insect activity. Whatever it is is no longer there.
OBJECTION - SUSTAINED
Black powder outside Velveeta paper? Yes, it appears. You can't take finger prints....
OBJECTION - outside of expertise - SUSTAINED
Chemical composition of wet trash would have been stronger than what it is 3 years later after being put in a dry room.
Has science evolved to identify signature compounds of human decomp? In his opinion - no.
This is your life's work?
OBJECTION - SUSTAINED
RECROSS BY JA:
Primary source always has the strongest odor? Yes, the odor will come from the highest concentration. If the source is moved? If the bag was removed from the trunk, he would think the odor would go with it unless there was residue. Some residue might be left behind?
OBJECTION - asked and answered - OVERRULED
Unless there was a leak in the bag, the odor should go with the bag.
Has anyone said the bag had an odor of human decomp?
OBJECTION - beyond scope - SUSTAINED
He did not read anything that anyone said the bag smelled like human decomp.
Witness is excured (3:47)