After watching the DT and SA presentations I don't see any reasonable doubt here. I have followed this case somewhat due to the sensationalism I really believe the SA had everything in order and the DT was all over the place just trying to blame other people GA specifically. I did not see where the accident theory was proven at all. Or a cover up by GA. Not to mention the OS regarding RK I did not see any proof at all of this.
Jury will remember JB's opening and wondering about all the statements he made and promises he did NOT deliver.
JB's opening and his behavior will be referenced for years to come in law schools as trap doors lawyers in training should never attemp.
Show me the diploma from law school. Show me the diploma.