2011.06.30 TRIAL Day Thirty-two (Afternoon Session)

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
Did you know before Ms. Anthony took the stand that she was going to say she was going to dispute the work records?

Baez: YES, we knew she could explain it perfect and that is what she did. And then the state went out and researched it more and dropped it in our lap

JP:Despite the fact that she was at work, did you know that those work records were meaningless?

NOT A DISCOVERY VIOLATION!!!!!

THANK YOU LORD.
 
Don't ya luv it! The DT uses CA for whatever benefits them. When CA can't or won't help their case, they don't want to hear it.
 
Woot!! Woot!!! They are coming in!!
 
NOT a discovery violation!! :woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo:
 
So JB took for granted that they could "use" the records in one way or another. BUT failed to consider that the State would follow through.
 
Thank you Judge Perry.......

How lucky to have this man for Caylee!!!
 
They say it is hard to get someone on perjury. Don't know how true that is.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
167
Guests online
1,623
Total visitors
1,790

Forum statistics

Threads
602,894
Messages
18,148,590
Members
231,580
Latest member
noizewarr
Back
Top