2011.06.30 TRIAL Day Thirty-two (Afternoon Session)

[tink92]

Ha Ha Ha ha ha ha Ha ha ha ha Ha ha ....take that baez:floorlaugh:

 

[MissSallyAnnie]

Did HHJBP just poke his meter stick in JB's eye socket?

:floorlaugh::great::floorlaugh:

 

[Reality Orlando]

"...a search for the truth." HHBP

 

[Sleuthsuthain]

I KNEW IT!!!! <hopping all over our home office>

 

[olive]

Justice for Caylee! Coming soon babygirl!!!

 

[ynotdivein]

I am giving CJBP the BIGGEST "magical hug" right now!!!!

"Trials are about the search for the truth. Juries are supposed to be given sufficient evidence to take the law, apply it against facts, and speak verdict that witnesses truth."

CJBP will advise the jury of certain factors--they can believe or disbelieve all or any part of any wit's testimony.

Remaining question is, how much time does defense need to adequately review these records and be prepared to effectively and intelligently cross-examine the witness?

 

[strawberry]

Yes, it is HUGE. If the State wins this then ALL of Cindy's testimony will be thrown out. This would be bad for the State, worse for the State than for the defense. The defense would suffer because the jury would know Cindy did not search for chloroform, and the jury could try to decide Who did.
But, Cindy's statements are valuable to the State.

I think it would actually make her statements helping the State MORE impactful. IOW I would know that she is trying to help her daughter and that any help she gave the SA was even watered down!!

 

[NavySubMom]

If CA had not lied, the jury would have to figure out on their own if ICA or CA made the searches. When she went on and on and one about her password and the work records would not be there, etc. NOW they will know that she LIED to protect ICA. NOW there is premeditation, proved by the mistruths of CA, who so desparately tried to save her daughter from the DP. Some times telling the truth is better than lying, IMO. Wow!!

 

[luv]

Woohoo!

No violation!

 

[AliVada]

I love this judge he knows his stuff and he is so fair ....

 

[pinkfly]

and he asks the dt how much time they need to be prepared

 

[GolferChick]

MarkEiglarsh Mark Eiglarsh
Judge Perry is doing a phenomenal job handling this alleged discovery violation. He is following the law perfectly.

 

[stillwatersc]

ICA could not testify. An emotional breakdown like CA or GA had on the stand would have been expected if her baby had accidentally drowned. Whatever defiant, jealous rage brought her through that horrible act is still propelling her now. Casey will not lower herself to show remorse or anything that even resembles or could be interpreted as remorse. She knows her parents will be watching.

 

[Softail]

Ya hear that Mr.Lippman? Your client lied! Under oath!

:gavel:

 

[MelissaLee]

JB confirming that the DT knew that CA was going to say her work records were not accurate.

HHJP asking if the records were computer generated (as opposed to manually kept).

Confirmed as computer generated.

HHJP asking if the computer generated records were confirmed as being true and accurate (not tampered with).

LDB confirming, stating there was a stipulation in place.

JB jumping in and arguing again before HHJP can completed his next question.

HHJP pursuant to Richardson vs. State - not a discovery violation. As soon as these particular records became pertinent, the SAO obtained the records and provided them to the DT. The DT raises the issue of prejudice. Trials are supposed to be about the search for the truth. Juries are supposed to be given sufficient evidence so they can take the law and apply it toward the facts so they can reach a verdict...

 

[Nova24]

She should just take the 5th.

 

[Jstc4caylee]

Effectively and intelligently ?????? uh, never.

 

[Curious Me]

:blowkiss:Thank You HHJP.

CAYLEE :candle:

 

[liltexans]

Judge Perry; "Trials are supposed to be about a search for the truth. Juries are supposed to be given sufficient evidence."
by amandaoberwesh via twitter at 1:11 PM

Perry rules no discovery violation. State will be allowed to present work records to jury. Baez looked down and pressed his lips together
by cfnews13casey via twitter at 1:11 PM

#Perry No discovery violation. Cindy's testimony re chloroform search about to be strongly undermined.
by bobkealing via twitter at 1:11 PM

"Trials are supposed to be about a search for the truth."
by judgeperrysays via twitter at 1:11 PM

#CaseyAnthony Judge Perry says NO discovery violation by state when it presented stack of Cindy's work records today to Baez
by amandaoberwesh via twitter at 1:11 PM

Perry: Gentiva records NOT a discovery violation. #CaseyAnthony
by oscaseyanthony via twitter at 1:11 PM

"The court will find that this was not a discovery violation."
by judgeperrysays via twitter at 1:10 PM

 

[BuffaloPI]

Court cam now showing a nervous, fidgety Cindy A.

Why so nervous, CA? :floorlaugh: