2011.07.06 Sidebar Thread (Post-Verdict)

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves

New Posts

Status
Not open for further replies.
tehcloser said:
If she tries that......ICA will sue her for all the pics she sold.
Click to expand...

Pictures belong to the person who took them. Maybe CA will sue ICA for stealing her pictures. :great:
 
nerdy said:
Not a copyright lawyer - but a photographer and these issues come up quite often in my life.

Photos belong to the person who pushed the button to take them - regardless of who owns the camera. When the photo is of a recognizable person - usage rights belong to the person shown unless an agreement has been signed allowing use of their image (aka a "model release")

Images of minors belong to their legal parent or guardian - regardless of who took the photo. They cannot be used or sold without permission. KC would win.

:sick:
Click to expand...

Rats! I didn't see this before I posted about the pics. Dang it! :banghead:
 
Ada said:
Pictures belong to the person who took them. Maybe CA will sue ICA for stealing her pictures. :great:
Click to expand...

If there was not a release signed by the person IN the photo they can't be sold. But, there is no way those two would sue each other....two peas in a pod.
 
"The six that voted guilty said it didn't matter at what point in time she came home and found out her daughter was missing," he said. "She had to report it in some way, shape or form, and that's where the negligence came in."
(http://www.tampabay.com/news/courts/article1179177.ece)

Are you kidding me??

Number one, this tells us that SIX of the jurors originally thought she should be found guilty of manslaughter.

Secondly, NO ONE claimed that Casey wasn't present when Caylee died! Even the DT said she was home when the child drowned. Where did the jurors pull that stuff from?

I do not want to bash the jurors in any way, but I just don't understand!
 
AquaEyes said:
OT a bit....I was thinking wouldn't it be nice if someone developed a rose and named it for Caylee? People could buy it and there would be Caylee rosebushes all over! Light purple for the color? I wonder how one goes about inserting that idea into a rose grower?

Aqua
Click to expand...
OT, also, I guess.
You know, I wouldn't be surprised if your idea caught on. I still have the rose petals I collected the day Caylee's remains were found and the day she was identified.

Was trying my best to walk away from all this but couldn't. Still need to hear what the posters here have to say; I know you guys know what the (unusual people) on TV don't know........it's all just " blah, blah , blah" from them, for the most part. imo
 
Etilema..I could probably find more reasons in favor of the argument that the world is flat than these jurors being of sound mind.
 
Etilema said:
"The six that voted guilty said it didn't matter at what point in time she came home and found out her daughter was missing," he said. "She had to report it in some way, shape or form, and that's where the negligence came in."
(http://www.tampabay.com/news/courts/article1179177.ece)

Are you kidding me??

Number one, this tells us that SIX of the jurors originally thought she should be found guilty of manslaughter.

Secondly, NO ONE claimed that Casey wasn't present when Caylee died! Even the DT said she was home when the child drowned. Where did the jurors pull that stuff from?

I do not want to bash the jurors in any way, but I just don't understand!
Click to expand...

Thank you again for posting this as I was VERY disturbed by the juror saying that "she came home and found her daughter was missing"!!!! I am trying very hard to cut this jury a lot of slack but that one statement alone makes me wonder what else they got wrong!
If someone can tell me how that juror (and it would have to more that than one for her to think that) got that information I would appreciate it!!!!
 
As my daughter often begins, "I'm not trying to be mean or anything, but..."

I'm sitting here watching Dominic C. on InSession and so help me, why would anyone think that just because this guy didn't find Caylee's remains that they weren't there?:waitasec:
 
FYI - just saw this on Twitter:

KBelichWFTV Cindy wanted to visit Casey tonight at 7 at the jail but Casey said no!
 
heartfortruth said:
Thank you again for posting this as I was VERY disturbed by the juror saying that "she came home and found her daughter was missing"!!!! I am trying very hard to cut this jury a lot of slack but that one statement alone makes me wonder what else they got wrong!
If someone can tell me how that juror (and it would have to more that than one for her to think that) got that information I would appreciate it!!!!
Click to expand...

The only thought that I have about this that remotely makes sense to me is that perhaps since they were instructed not to take the opening statements or closing arguments as evidence, they didn't think about either the pros or def claims for whether Casey was there, and only looked at the fact that there was no evidence presented about where she was when it happened.

But then if I look at it that way, the evidence is that she told police, herself, that she was the last actual (not imaginary) person to see Caylee, even though she didn't say she was there when she died, of course.

And there was NO evidence to suggest she ever "came home" and discovered her daughter missing. What must they have been thinking? That Caylee drowned while GA was babysitting and then hid the body on his own??

The statements of the self-described hold-out juror really upset me, because he clearly thinks Caylee was murdered:

"To think that somebody would do that to a child."

He doesn't think it was an accident!

So some of them think it was murder, but because they couldn't figure out whether Caylee was in the care of her mother or her grandparents at the time, they don't know WHO murdered her, it seems. Wow.
 
salvarenga said:
FYI - just saw this on Twitter:

KBelichWFTV Cindy wanted to visit Casey tonight at 7 at the jail but Casey said no!
Click to expand...

of course not. She's done.. and they would still be recorded. KC wants to exact her vengeance on CA in private. After all, it was HER FAULT KC was in jail in the first place. I'd be running away if I were CA.
 
Etilema said:
The statements of the self-described hold-out juror really upset me, because he clearly thinks Caylee was murdered:

"To think that somebody would do that to a child."

He doesn't think it was an accident!
Click to expand...

Quoting myself from above, because I realized that he *could* have meant, "Who could have thrown her body into the woods like that?" But his other statements lead me to suspect otherwise.
 
poco said:
I should go buy a bunch of these - but it's pouring out!!!!
Click to expand...

What of Caylee’s father?
In a case filed with mystery and fantasy,
the possibilities include four men, three
of whom died in car wrecks. 6A
Click to expand...

and that jury let that crazy girl go free lol.
 
salvarenga said:
FYI - just saw this on Twitter:

KBelichWFTV Cindy wanted to visit Casey tonight at 7 at the jail but Casey said no!
Click to expand...

I just saw that too! I was waiting fo that to happen...I knew it would!
 
Mamabear1963 said:
I think he knows the system failed...I felt for him. He tried so hard not to be biased against the DT...because in his heart he was. If HHJP ever writes a book I am going to read it.
Click to expand...

I don't believe it was the system but rather this particular jury. Possibly HHJP is questioning himself about the jury selection process he oversaw. Possibly he is questioning whether he did not make the instructions or laws clearer. If he has heard any of the reasons jurors are giving for their decision I can't help but think he is upset. Then there is the compensation issue with these jurors that he must also be wondering about. That is something out of the judge's control and nothing can be done but very disappointing none the less.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

DNASolves

Who is Fairfield County Jane Doe (1993)?

Members online

... and 188 more.
Total: 407 (members: 189, guests: 218)

Online statistics

Members online
189
Guests online
218
Total visitors
407
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads
608,790
Messages
18,245,847
Members
234,453
Latest member
LaRae83854
Back
Top