Yes ... the "juror" has a responsibility to inform the Judge IMMEDIATELY !
SOMETHING IS NOT RIGHT HERE !
I TRULY BELIEVE THERE WAS SOME KIND OF TAMPERING !
:banghead::banghead::banghead:
Is someone saying one or more of the jurors was contacted before the trial? If so, didn't they have a responsibility to inform the judge of that ?
Apologies, yes. I am at work so I am going on by what has been quoted here.
I understand JB didn't deny or confirm if he had signed anything with William Morris. I will eat my shoes if he did. They are a huge, top level agency and don't rep killers, fellons or lawyers. I know they handle some politicians but they wouldn't touch him with a 10 foot pole.
I didn't see what Jose said/no idea if it was on tv or a written statement but this is Jose. He wants everyone to think agents are lining up to get press.
I don't feel the jury needs to be hounded or harassed. However, there was an interesting argument made by one of the media lawyers. In small communities, jurors are all known to all participants and that is the way it was back in the day. I think that those juries, IMOO, might tend to be a little more thoughtful and thorough in their decision of judging a fellow community member because their friends and neighbors know who they are. That is the reason that they are giving as to why they are arguing against anonymous juries - but it's probably just so that they can get higher ratings. Although, it's odd that many of the jurors appear to already be known. I wasn't clear if she was saying that they knew, or if it was other less reputable "journalists" who had found them out.
If Juror 3 didn't think it was first degree murder, there were so many lesser charges they could have convicted on. I just don't think the jury understood the instructions or their options.I know, this is ABC, the network we know pays. Juror #3 is on ABC...this woman is incredible. Judge for yourself. She goes after NG, too...NG responds in the video. Wow...
http://abcnews.go.com/US/casey_anth...uilty-verdict-lesser-charge/story?id=14017505
I don't want to start any rumors. Did someone actually say jurors were contacted prior to the trial or is that just speculation? Anyone? TIA
My family deserves more good time than ICA or her family.
If I remember correctly it was ABC that actually provided the trip to Disney not an offer by DIsney itself.
Anyone can help with this????
Pleaseeeeeeeeeeee, keep us updated!!!!!!!!!!!!!! TIA.
I have this bad habit of reading the thread backwards Wishbone so I thought you were. Assumed actually so I'm reading from page one now and sitting on my hands except to respond to you.
I'm so angry and hurt I could scream. ITA with your position...now that I'm not assuming I know what you meant in a one sentence response to someone else. Sorry- my bad totally.
I just never saw this coming and it's destroyed my belief system a little. Okay a lot!
I think CA's cousin is not only coocoo, but has been told exactly what to say by the mighty queen bee Cindy. It is just another way of putting poison into the minds of society so they will buy into their story they want to make money off of. It proves that Cindy doesn't believe and has never believed Casey did it.
Yes ... the "juror" has a responsibility to inform the Judge IMMEDIATELY !
SOMETHING IS NOT RIGHT HERE !
I TRULY BELIEVE THERE WAS SOME KIND OF TAMPERING !
:banghead::banghead::banghead:
Yes, but Disney works furiously to protect the brand - I daresay that won't make them happy (trying to remember who owns ABC now...)