back2back19
New Member
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2011
- Messages
- 452
- Reaction score
- 0
No, are Greta's posters mad that she is doing the interview with the juror?
When I looked a few hours ago, they were not happy.
No, are Greta's posters mad that she is doing the interview with the juror?
Actually, they didn't see more than me or most of WS'ers - what they did see is the actual photo of the skull and the simulation of the tape over Caylee's mouth and nose - that's it
Absolutely-in fact, they saw far less. They never knew that she referred to her daughter as a "snothead" to a guy that wanted her to come over and get jiggy.
IMO, you are right. In fact, ICBW, but I believe the superimposition only showed the outline of ONE piece of duct tape, in order to prove that just one strip would have been wide enough to have caused Caylee's death.... The inference perhaps being that the three long strips were overkill on KC's part.The superimposed 're-creation was only to show how 3 pieces of duct could have covered the mouth and nose.
The jury and those in the courtroom saw the ACTUAL PICTURES of Caylee's skull with the duct tape across the nasal holes, and mandible, attaching on both sides to the hair mat. The jury and those in the courtroom saw the picture of Caylee's skull BEFORE the duct tape was clipped off, to remove it. WE, the public, only saw the ACTUAL SKULL blurred. Where are ya'll getting the idea that the only picture of Caylee's skull seen by the jury was the superimposed re-creation? JA stated if the jury looked at the actual pix of Caylee's skull with the duct tape attached, there would be no way they would not call it a homicide.
Please, let's get this straight. Too many here have stated that the re-creation was the picture of Caylee's skull with the ductape...WRONG!
My point was that they saw the actual skull as it was found. I did not. My point was that I can't understand after seeing all of the evidence they DID see, how they could come on Dateline and excuse it all away. 31 days as "Whoa, yeah, that's like real bad, but we couldn't go on emotion."
It appears they threw out alot of evidence because of what they are somehow calling emotion, but once they tossed it aside, they suddenly had no answers as COD.
I'm simply flummoxed.
Slightly OT, but wasn't one of the jurors the daughter of a lawyer?
That was juror number 7.
Do we know which two jurors were the two for guilty at the beginning of deliberation?
Yes, that alt. juror watched her 'body language' and decided she was SINCERE.
I guess it didn't matter that she lied her arse off for 31 days. Because he watched her close and she looked sincere to him. I just cannot get past that moronic statement. How can the biggest PROVEN LIAR in the nation be given the label "SINCERE" by one of the jurors?
No, are Greta's posters mad that she is doing the interview with the juror?
It boggles the mind. And to think there were at least 12 more like that. I feel like I've been watching a Swamp People movie from the seventies.kay:
Young men like the one who thinks she's sincere are the ones that will become entangled with her in the future.
Well, actually I wouldn't mind if I was quilty. All you have to do is look cute, be white and never tell the actual truth to anyone. Casey never even had to get up on the stand and be questioned; don't know how anyone can judge someone not quilty if they don't hear from their own lips they didn't do it.
Scary world we live in......sigh
Thanks for the awesome commentary. I couldn't bring myself to watch it. Like some of you mentioned in this thread, I too am very concerned about my emotional and psychological health, resultant of this unjust outcome.
I will NEVER follow another case...ever...and this is coming from someone who has been following true crime for the last 10 years. I've just never felt so sick.
I appreciate the humorous posts, it's good for my soul...I forgot how so many of you always seem to make me smile and/outright laugh.
I think jury questionnaires throughout the US need to add the question: Did you serve on the Casey Anthony Trial or know someone who did? (sarcasm)
that's all we need is this case becoming about Race. Look the state didn't prove the case I posted during the trial saying I didn't think they was proving it as much as some thought and I was basically treated not so nicely. I was polite but yet thought that replied to me was not. I posted how the state along with CA attorney going at each other acting like kids was GOING To effect the outcome of the case and I was laughed at and my post deleted. Guess I was not as dumb as some treated me as.
You know what's kind of funny? JVM was interviewing people on the street about their feelings on the verdict. Every single one of the young men she asked were pro-KC!
Bingo (bolded by me)
We have often spoken here about the difference in trials depending on race and the treatment of missing children depending on race. I wonder what the outcome would have been if Casey was Black or Hispanic. Or if she was a 45 year old, obese, missing teeth, etc. It might have been exactly the same but I wonder. Our society can sometimes be awfully shallow. Even me, as hard as I try to be deep. :crazy:
Who has heard anything about Adji lately? Or the other missing African American or Haitian or Hispanic little children? There is a pretty blond girl missing and now thought deceased here in Macon, though.
Before I get a gentle reminder that I am OT :seeya: mods I'll add that this jury is subject to the same prejudices and such as I am.
Most of the nation would have barely have even heard of Caylee, if she was not an adorable little white girl from the suburbs, IMO...