Ok. Let's go that route then. If Caylee had accidentally drowned in June of 2008 as has been claimed by the defense team and 911 had not been called BUT when asked where Caylee was in July of 2008 if KC had replied that she had died in an accidental drowning and then taken/told the police where Caylee was, would she have been arrested in the first place? She was originally arrested for lying to police, child endangerment and whatever else it was. So if KC had "told the truth" about what had happened to Caylee at that time in July 2008 would she have been arrested? Would there have been a trial? Would her mother have lied on the stand?
OR, would the police look at the evidence with Caylee at the dump site and realized that there is no way in heck that a 2 1/2 child that had accidentally drowned would have duct tape across her mouth and nose, triple bagged and left in a swampy area to rot? Would the police and the State then have enough (more than enough) evidence against the mother to charge her with 1st degree murder and get a conviction that then was punishable by death?
There is a reason that KC refused to tell police, Cindy, George, Lee, TES, LP and everyone else where Caylee was. That reason was not so that KC would not be arrested, she was arrested anyway for NOT telling the truth. That reason was so that Caylee would not be found so that KC could get away with murder, which IMO she did.