norest4thewicked
True Crime Writer
I think that the title of this thread should be changed to - TONY PIPITONE REPORTS NEW EVIDENCE DISCOVERED BY AZLAWYER AND JWG.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If George was trying to find information on ways to kill himself he would have googled "How to commit suicide" or "suicide" or "how to kill myself" NOT "fool-proof suffication" The thing that googled that was looking for ways to "sufficate" someone and make sure it worked. I too believe she may have attempted it before but was unsuccessful.![]()
Do I think Casey had tried to kill Caylee prior to these searches? No! I think Casey made the decision to kill Caylee the night of June 15th, 2008 and had to wait for her father to go to work the next day in order to do it.
There is no doubt in my mind that Caylee was murdered to spite Cindy.
MOO
I think that the title of this thread should be changed to - TONY PIPITONE REPORTS NEW EVIDENCE DISCOVERED BY AZLAWYER AND JWG.
I have a question for AZLawyer and JWG. How was the Firefox information sent to you, and why did you not receive the entire contents of the hard drive? Was there any explanation given for what was withheld?
I knew that JWG and Tony Pipitone had tried to get the hard drive images (both desktop and laptop) from the SA office before, but were unsuccessful. I tried that way first, just to see what would happen. I learned that the SA did not have the hard drives, so they could not provide images. I then made a public records request to OCSO for the hard drives, and learned that OCSO did have the hard drives, but could not simply turn over the imaged hard drives without redacting private information unrelated to the case, which would have been impossible. OCSO suggested as an alternative just sending me the internet history files, and I said that would be fine, but I wanted all the internet history files, not just the ones previously released to the media. By that time, OCSO had figured out how to extract the internet history files that Linda had been looking for pretrial :banghead:, so I got all of them. I then sent the files to JWG to run through the forensic software that makes them much more readable.
As I understand it, the only internet history files I didn't receive were deleted files that the OCSO had not "rescued" from the hard drives. They had found some deleted files pretrial, which we already knew about and had, but they weren't going to (and weren't required to) try to find more deleted files just to respond to a public records request. So there are periods of time for which we don't have internet history information--like most of the "31 day" time period for the laptop. If JWG had the hard drive images, I'm sure he could have found more of that information.
Very unfortunate that the 31 day time period was not recovered. I can understand that they wouldn't do this for a public records request, but you would have thought they would have made the effort pre-trial to obtain that information. Was this the laptop recovered from Tony Lazzaro's residence that had been wiped? That would have been what she was using for those 31 days!!
Thank you!
Mod Note:
Guys, we're slowly starting to spiral off track. Please keep this thread limited to the info discussed during the interview. We've got about 10,000 other threads that are topical. If you see one is locked and you'd like me to open it, please just alert the thread and I will comply asap!
I hope they think about it now, if it's not too late.Yes, that's the same laptop. I don't know if they tried to retrieve those deleted files or not.
Before this thread gets closed - I want to thank both of you - AZLawyer and JWG for your amazing and incredible work. Well done!
While I really regret Tony Piptone reported it in the manner he did - so that subsequent or followup reporting by other news media focuses on implied sloppy work by the OCSD and even the SA - and give kudos to Baez..:banghead: rather than doing some hard reporting and pointing out obvious or probable conclusions pointing to FCA's guilt.
It is unreasonable to suggest anyone else could have done those searches - so for me Tony just went over to the dark side at the end of his expose when he agreed with Baez that you can never tell who was on a computer. So I wanted more focus on the guilty person - FCA. Just because she can't be recharged doesn't mean we - the public- should be sliding away from this knowledge and trying to dumb it down!
That's like saying - well you look like Baez - you talk like him, your ID says you are him, and you showed up when Baez said he was going to show up to film this - but I dunno - maybe you're an alien who abducted him on the way to the studio.......duh..
I thought I heard there would be a 2nd part to this story. I must have missed it does anyone know if there is another video or another part to this story? I thought Pipitone said the next night would be part 2...sorry the holidays are getting to me as usual
Yes, that's the same laptop. I don't know if they tried to retrieve those deleted files or not.