2015.08.27 Curtis Wayne Wright: Charged with Murder in the 2nd Degree

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves

New Posts

Lilibet said:
Wise choice. It's one of those rabbit holes we go down when there isn't anything new. Interesting, but we have bigger fish to fry, as the saying goes. I'd still like to know why LE considers CWW the POI in the Ron Bolin disappearance. But that's a different thread. It would be interesting to know how CWW, Bolin and the Lifkas might be connected since they were all so active in computer technology at the time. And how does MS fit in. I'm heading off to make a diagram. :)

http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sh...A-Bolin-33-Jefferson-County-8-July-1996/page4
Click to expand...
JMO but maybe all were involved in various con artist IT schemes to put it lightly and or selling meth. IMO I think CWW had to "retire" because he could no longer use his embellished resume to get an IT job in the corporate world. IMO he was found out by the Lifkas. As a result he could only do work for people that would give him a break like MS. Also since most companies do background checks his arrest records would not serve him very well either.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk
 
While I don't believe it was what the sheriff was referring to, I'm beginning to think books and movies could be made about the life of CWW. I appreciate Skinner "verifying" CWW's resume. To me it really makes a difference in how I view CWW.

To me, the difference between total resume fabrication and a bit of resume puffing is huge in this case. There had to be some real talent there, some real brains. CWW's list of crimes & possible crimes could result from simply a normal crook, starting small, moving on to drugs, and eventually darker crimes. Instead, given CWW's possible intelligence, I see him more as a manipulator. Gaining experience to pull off bigger and bigger crimes, using the pawns around him and discarding them when he is done. Both "stories" wind up at the same conclusion, the difference is only in how I see him.

Depending on where the truth lies- what crimes has he really, actually done- he may be almost an evil genius. I'm wondering if there were times in the past where it seemed CWW was finally going to have to pay the piper, as we think will happen in this case, but somehow he has always skated away.

Then there is the whole issue of how he fits in with MS. If MS was involved (which I lean toward, but I totter back and forth a bit), who was manipulating who? Or were they really equal partners? Did they both feel they were manipulating the other?

So many questions. Hoping for a few answers to roll in soon.

All very much speculation & my own opinions & ramblings.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Eileen730 said:
Do you KNOW Mark Sievers?
Click to expand...

Thanks for your honesty AmazonRain! After reading some of your posts, I thought you must know him.

Your safety is of the upmost importance. Thank you for sharing your knowledge with us.
 
Sunkist said:
Then there is the whole issue of how he fits in with MS. If MS was involved (which I lean toward, but I totter back and forth a bit), who was manipulating who? Or were they really equal partners? Did they both feel they were manipulating the other?
Click to expand...
. Snipped for space.

What a great question on who was manipulating who? It seems that the two manipulators goofed on how smart the LE is!

However, IMO, their biggest mistake was how MS thought he could continue the practice after his wife was dead? Her practice is where his money came from and CWW was involved in dirty dealings in one or more forms from her practice too. IMO.
 
Sunkist said:
While I don't believe it was what the sheriff was referring to, I'm beginning to think books and movies could be made about the life of CWW. I appreciate Skinner "verifying" CWW's resume. To me it really makes a difference in how I view CWW.

To me, the difference between total resume fabrication and a bit of resume puffing is huge in this case. There had to be some real talent there, some real brains. CWW's list of crimes & possible crimes could result from simply a normal crook, starting small, moving on to drugs, and eventually darker crimes. Instead, given CWW's possible intelligence, I see him more as a manipulator. Gaining experience to pull off bigger and bigger crimes, using the pawns around him and discarding them when he is done. Both "stories" wind up at the same conclusion, the difference is only in how I see him.

Depending on where the truth lies- what crimes has he really, actually done- he may be almost an evil genius. I'm wondering if there were times in the past where it seemed CWW was finally going to have to pay the piper, as we think will happen in this case, but somehow he has always skated away.

Then there is the whole issue of how he fits in with MS. If MS was involved (which I lean toward, but I totter back and forth a bit), who was manipulating who? Or were they really equal partners? Did they both feel they were manipulating the other?

So many questions. Hoping for a few answers to roll in soon.

All very much speculation & my own opinions & ramblings.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Good post.

Made me think: One thing that could point to MS not being the puppeteer and asking CWW to have TS killed is that CWW is just so obvious to be pegged as an instant POI/suspect in any crime that goes down around him. He might as well wear a flashing neon sign that reads "BAD GUY".

MS would've had to know that LE would investigate family, friends and co-workers after the murder and would come to a screeching halt at CWW, which could easily result in exposing MS's involvement. Super risky to think that CWW could fly under the radar.

Although I guess I could say the same for CWW. He also should have known he'd instantly be a suspect when his employer/bff's wife was found murdered, and it apparently didn't stop him. And now we know he is some sort of evil genius!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
CWW IS the definition of "hubris." I guess we'll find out if MS shares the "honor."

http://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/hubris

kammiemc said:
Good post.

Made me think: One thing that could point to MS not being the puppeteer and asking CWW to have TS killed is that CWW is just so obvious to be pegged as an instant POI/suspect in any crime that goes down around him. He might as well wear a flashing neon sign that reads "BAD GUY".

MS would've had to know that LE would investigate family, friends and co-workers after the murder and would come to a screeching halt at CWW, which could easily result in exposing MS's involvement. Super risky to think that CWW could fly under the radar.

Although I guess I could say the same for CWW. He also should have known he'd instantly be a suspect when his employer/bff's wife was found murdered, and it apparently didn't stop him. And now we know he is some sort of evil genius!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

BBM
 
kammiemc said:
Good post.

Made me think: One thing that could point to MS not being the puppeteer and asking CWW to have TS killed is that CWW is just so obvious to be pegged as an instant POI/suspect in any crime that goes down around him. He might as well wear a flashing neon sign that reads "BAD GUY".

MS would've had to know that LE would investigate family, friends and co-workers after the murder and would come to a screeching halt at CWW, which could easily result in exposing MS's involvement. Super risky to think that CWW could fly under the radar.

Although I guess I could say the same for CWW. He also should have known he'd instantly be a suspect when his employer/bff's wife was found murdered, and it apparently didn't stop him. And now we know he is some sort of evil genius!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

I like your thought process here and it makes sense, especially since it seems he's been able to escape mostly unscathed from numerous things in the past. He probably figures he's untouchable and smarter than the average (insert your choice here).
 
creepingskills said:
Yes. Skinner is verified, as being a person who is friends with MS.
Click to expand...

Below Skinner's name ... Does it say he is a verified poster? The reason why I'm asking is that when I checked recently, it simply said "registered user", aka not "verified".

So what is it?
 
From the first post in the Skinner thread


Dear Websleuths Members,

Please join me in welcoming "Skinner" to our forum.

Skinner is a verified poster. He is a long-time friend of Mark Sievers.

Short of hiring a private detective I am confident Skinner is a close friend of Mark Sievers.

Please remember as a verified member Skinner does not need to provide links to the information in his posts.

It is up to you to believe him or not.

I will not tolerate even the slightest snark against Skinner.

You are allowed to ask questions but you cannot harass. Take Skinner's answer and decide what you want to do with the information.

Skinner, I know you want to clear up so me misconceptions or misinformation. You have come to the right place 

Thank you,
Tricia


Sent from my KFJWI using Tapatalk
 
relay said:
Was the "registered user" never changed to "verified insider" or did Skinner change it back to "registered user" from "verified insider"?
Click to expand...

I KNOW for a 100% fact Tricia verified him. I imagine she just was busy and forgot to change his user title. I will contact her now to make sure there is no other reason of which I am unaware. If she confirms, I will change it shortly.

Y'all, I apologize but please try to understand, Tricia, I and the rest of the Siever mods are slammed busy. (e.g., My inbox holds 1,500 pms and I am deleting everyday just so new ones won't be bouncing. I don't even want to think about the emails... :sigh: ) Things like this might slip through the cracks but it is unintentional and please don't read anymore into it other than the simple fact that we must've just missed it.

ETA: Just spoke to Tricia and she said she knew she added him to the Verified Insiders List, but must have forgotten to change his user title. I'll do it now. Problem solved.
 
beach said:
I KNOW for a 100% fact Tricia verified him. I imagine she just was busy and forgot to change his user title. I will contact her now to make sure there is no other reason of which I am unaware. If she confirms, I will change it shortly.



Y'all, I apologize but please try to understand, Tricia, I and the rest of the Siever mods are slammed busy. (e.g., My inbox holds 1,500 pms and I am deleting everyday just so new ones won't be bouncing. I don't even want to think about the emails... :sigh: ) Things like this might slip through the cracks but it is unintentional and please don't read anymore into it other than the simple fact that we must've just missed it.
Click to expand...

Thank you for looking into it---& perhaps it was a simple oversight. You know us; we don't miss a thing us sleuthers (wink wink).

TIA
 
Hi Everyone,

If you have any question about who is verified you can check the verified public list. Skinner is on post #4.

If you look under "Sievers, Teresa" you will see Skinner is verified. You will see the last edit is on Sept 4 when I believe is when I verified Skinner.

http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sh...amp-Verified-Insiders&p=11841005#post11841005

The list has professionals such as doctors and lawyers. It also has the names of cases.

All I ask is to please not jump to the worst conclusions if you see a mistake on the forum.

Thank you,
Tricia
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

DNASolves

Who is Fairfield County Jane Doe (1993)?

Staff online

Members online

... and 139 more.
Total: 357 (members: 140, guests: 217)

Online statistics

Members online
140
Guests online
217
Total visitors
357
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads
608,724
Messages
18,244,633
Members
234,435
Latest member
ProfKim
Back
Top