Pages 1 & 2 (of 5) pages at link* =
STIPULATION of Parties (meaning Atty's for St of ID and BCK)
They stipulated to a release of a Memo summary of In Chambers conference, Jan 13,which was filed Jan. 20 under seal.
Redactions made from Memo were names of potential witnesses & names of their attys (for threats or danger to their lives or safety).
Then, pages 3 to 5 (of 5 pages) = MEMO itself, a summary of the conference in chambers of Judge Marshall, and naming those attending, which included Prosecutor, Deputy Pros., Atty for Redacted, and a diff Atty for another Redacted, Shanon Gray, Atty for Goncalves fam, and PD Anne Taylor.
At this conference Judge Marshall read aloud:
--from her Nondissemination Order (gag order) and
-- Idaho Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 3.6, Trial Publicity.**
(Briefly, oversimplified, imo, Rule for atty's involved in investigation & litigation of matter: SU, wait, & say it in court.)
She said she reads Rule & Commentary as applying to atty's for witnesses, & to Pros. & PD.
Advises the atty's present "not to engage in any conduct which would interfere with a fair trial."
Also says her order does not prevent wit's from speaking to media.
imo jmo moo As always, welcoming clarification or corrections, esp'ly from our legal professionals.
___________________________________
*
https://coi.isc.idaho.gov/docs/case/CR29-22-2805/022423 Stipulation to Unseal with Redactions.pdf
**
https://isb.idaho.gov/wp-content/uploads/irpc.pdf
Rule 3.6, pages 44-45. Relevant quotes in my earlier posts.