Nila Aella
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2022
- Messages
- 1,168
- Reaction score
- 9,598
Sy Rays Testimony:My interpretation differs. MOO. I thought Sy Ray was only trying to get the prosecution to turn over more data. 1) Seems if you want something, you better tell them they benefit by turning it over. 2) Sy is running a business. He has a financial interest to get more data for analysis. No more data, limits what he can do/say. 3) Also, one of the keys for me was how he claims the data is piecemeal, missing data; yet, he has enough to know it is "incredibly inaccurate." What? Is that because the data is not showing him at the park watching the moon and stars? He made these statements because he wanted the data during the crime (when his phone was presumably turned off or something) and didn't get it. Again MOO. I look forward to seeing how this plays out in the trial.
From article: Cellphone expert testifies missing data benefits University of Idaho murder suspect "Because of the piecemealing of the data, because of the missing data, because of the data I'm reviewing that is incredibly inaccurate, everything that is missing is absolutely in benefit of the defense right now," Ray testified, adding, "There are other reports that are missing that I can't tell you are benefiting of Mr. Kohberger or the state."
The 2-3% missing is Field Testing data along 270 and the Crime Scene.
LE did five days of drive testing (151:38)
82 percent of the points LE did obtain were not plotted.
Why it is important according to SR
159:40
He is talking about 2-6AM the morning of the 13th
Adding the 82 % will tell a much more detailed story
Adding the drive testing will refine it even more.
147:38 Drive test
The portions missing:
Unable to find any locations on 270 - missing the entire stretch
The crime scene
154:38
This data is from the drive testing
He could see significant errors, errors which would have a ripple effect.
Scenarios for why the data is missing: never captured, machine error on one portion of the drive test, data extracted.
In addition to the above missing data: More than 80% of the CDR was not plotted. The FBI only mapped 6%. Det M only 18%.
156:14
I have had concern since the very first day I saw the Cast Draft report that there are significant errors. I can look at the coverage areas and I can tell you they are wrong.
201:15
There are statements and assumptions made in the records that will never be supported by the data.
There are a lot of claims made in these emails and even in the name files. It does not represent what is claimed to represent.
204:15
As I have gotten more documents, I am finding a lot of misstatements that have been made.
JMO